JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

Forums

12/13/2018 5:21:23 AM
21
Battlefront 2. All that lootbox outrage was just plain silly considering every game does the same thing
English

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • I thought it was still a bad game even without them. The PS2 games are far better.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • OG battlefront was the best, they should just add everything that was left out from there (especially jawas running around it's always fun killing them)

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • All DICE had to do was make a good Battlefield game with a Star Wars skin. I would have liked no health regeneration, limited ammo, all classes and heroes unlocked, but you still have to earn them in matches. No star cards, instead either attachments or mods to weapons or just do what the PS2 Battlefront 2 did to where you got an upgrade to a weapon or ability if you did something. Both EA Battlefront games are far too casualized for my tastes. EA BF2's story was also a joke and showed that OG BF2's was far superior. Split screen is also incredibly lacking in content for both EA games and only single player for online is silly.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • [quote]Battlefront 2. All that lootbox outrage was just plain silly considering every game does the same thing[/quote] Yeah, god knows I don't hate murders because other people murder. Something isn't wrong if more than one group does it.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • In this case it's like getting outraged about one murderer while not caring about the 12 other murderers who have been murdering all year

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Horrible game the first one was better

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Every aspect of bf2 was better than the first one in my opinion. I can see how people wouldn't like the class system though

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • The first one was better in terms of customization (there actually was customization) and the inclusion of walker assault but other than that i don't see how it's better

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Heroes vs Villains is better, a campaign, Starfighter is better, free dlcs. There's still customization, it's just less

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Starfighter shit is amazing in 2. By customization i meant like the ability to be a dude sniper (why are all snipers girls these days it's weird)

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Strafighters is basically the only great thing about the game. The twin stick controls are amazing. Now if only a whole game was made around them...

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Even though I never played it, I'm inclined to agree. Garden Warfare 2 is another EA game with lootboxes, and their significance is greatly blown out of proportion. I will say though, what EA did to the original Plants vs Zombies is inexcusable.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Battlefront's loot boxes were different in that progression was locked behind them, making character improvements both random and pay to win.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Even after it released with a simplified system people still acted like it was super evil

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Not true, bf2 wasnt pay to win. Nothing was locked behind a paywall, you could play to get better stuff, like i and most other people did. Its a misconception by people WHO didnt play it, that it was p2w

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • If you bought loot boxes you'd have stronger classes and heroes than people that only played to earn loot boxes, because you'd have more. How is that not pay to win?

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • You couldn't buy loot boxes. It was impossible to spend money on loot boxes after launch. Not pay to win

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • They were gonna let you buy them but then the backlash happened

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Very true. That means it was going to be pay to win, but that doesn't make the game pay to win

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • [quote]You couldn't buy loot boxes. It was impossible to spend money on loot boxes after launch. Not pay to win[/quote] Yeah, but it was possible to buy them if you had the game on EA access. The system itself without money involved also ruined the game. Battlefront isn't a looter. It was a competitive multiplayer game but by the time players like me got around to playing it I was outclassed. Not because players could out gun me not because they were better players but because they had cards that made me inferior in everyway. I wasn't about to slog through EAs shitty progression system just to have a decent time.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • I came in late too. I found that if you were better you would win. If it was even, the person with the better cards won. That being said I totally agree with your view

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon