{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
12/10/2015 7:23:02 PM
2
I love how everyone reads that Twitter and assumes he's talking about the original values being a typo.
99% of the complaints on here are based on misinterpretation and exaggeration.
English
-
[quote]Notes for 2.1.0 have been revised with correct damage values for Auto/Pulse rifles. [/quote] [quote]It was an extremely unfortunate typo, but the change was intentional.[/quote] It's pretty clear he was referring to the original values in the patch notes, before they were edited.
-
Then do you want to explain why my spare change is dealing 33 damage on a headshot, instead of 38? That's a whole hell of a lot more than .9% reduction. In fact, that works out to approximately 9%. Which just so happens to be [i]the original stated percentage[/i]. With auto rifles, the original numbers would only raise the damage by one point. I've not used ARs much, but they do seem to be functioning as intended. I know math is tough for children, but at least make the effort.
