I have an idea. We could build nuclear power plants on the coasts of our cooler regions (e.g. Alaska, Iceland, etc.) to ensure that the chances of overheating/natural disasters are significantly reduced. If we ran cooling coils through the ocean coasts in those regions, we would have not only a natural coolant, but also a way to quickly evaporate the water. Not only would there be zero pollutants (in this process, specifically), but it would kill two birds with one stone.
If the heat from the coils "steamed" the water into large containers, we would have a method of cleanly converting salt water to fresh water. We would also have a relatively clean form of energy (i.e. nuclear). If we could recycle the nuclear waste, we would have a pretty solid system going.
Nuclear desalination. It's not a bad effort. My idea of electrolysis (in order to produce deuterium for fusion use/research and then use/sell/recombine the O2 and H) is more complex, but would result in an additional energy source and/or fresh water).
The key element in such a plant/system is the initial energy investment. Your proposal of fission plants is currently feasible, but likely to generate outcry and debate. If/when we ever get fusion, provided we can appropriately utilize it (be more long-viewed in its use as opposed to how can we restrict it in order to contain/control/maintain maximum profitability in the moment) there is a lot of potential there.