[quote]The majority of people on Earth people will face severe water shortages within a generation or two if pollution and waste continues unabated, scientists warned at a conference in Bonn Friday.
"This handicap will be self-inflicted and is, we believe entirely avoidable," read a document entitled The Bonn Declaration issued at the close of the four-day international huddle.
The conference sought to assess the evidence of Man's impact on freshwater resources, which constitute only 2.5 percent of the total volume of water on Earth.
Currently, an estimated third of the world's seven million people has limited access to adequate fresh water, according to conference delegates.
"In the short span of one or two generations, the majority of the nine billion people on Earth will be living under the handicap of severe pressure on fresh water," said the declaration.
The nine billion mark is widely projected to be reached from about 2040.
"We are flying the red flag out of our conference here," Charles Vorosmarty, co-chairman of the Global Water System Project research body that hosted the meeting, said in a teleconference from Bonn.
"These self-inflicted wounds have long-term legacy effects that are not easy to turn around."
The declaration points out that humanity uses an area the size of South America to grow crops and another the size of Africa to raise livestock.
Two-thirds of major river deltas are sinking due to groundwater extraction, and tens of thousands of large dams are distorting natural river flows on which ecosystems have depended for millennia.
Much damage is being done by river pollution from sewer drainage or agricultural fertiliser and pesticide use.
Already, about a billion people around the world are dependent on finite water supplies being depleted at a fast rate, said Vorosmarty, who made a plea for more financial and technical resources for research.
"We're not making the requisite commitments to creating observational networks and satellite systems that can measure the state of water," he said.
"Increasingly, we are flying blind and finding it very difficult to figure where we are and where we're going and whether the things we are doing are making a difference."
UN-Water, a coordinating body for water efforts by UN groups, says Earth has about 35 million cubic kilometres (eight million cubic miles) of fresh water—70 percent of it locked up in ice and permanent snow cover.
Thirty percent of freshwater is stored underground in groundwater, which constitutes 97 percent of all freshwater potentially available for human use.
About 0.3 percent is found in lakes and rivers.
Experts say some 3,800 cubic kilometres of fresh water are extracted from aquatic ecosystems around the world each year, partly as a result of global warming.[/quote][url=http://phys.org/news/2013-05-source-life-scientists.html]Source[/url]
-
4 回复>Switch to Gatorade as an alternative >Saturate crops with Gatorade >Use Gatorade as a worldwide hydration source ??? >Profit +10 Internet points for reference.
-
由M37h3w3编辑: 5/26/2013 5:17:15 AMAt this point. I don't really care. So many people are fighting changes to the status quo because it'll "hurt" businesses, or the economy, or we don't need to and it's a waste of money, or X reason that exists because it'll make the speaker in question (or his affiliates) oodles of cash for preserving the status quo, that frankly I feel like I'm at the point where I'm just going to let this train collide with the side of the mountain. Just gonna buy house next to a mountain, dig a hole into it, and store food, water and books and watch the world burn. Then, once the train hits and lots of people die, I'll come out, show the survivors that those in charge knew and acted against everyone's best interests, (they'll be alive because ya know, the rich get privileged) and then retreat. So go ahead, destroy the delta ecosystem to pump billions of gallons of water so we can farm in the desert. Don't care. Cut down the rainforest for grazing land for cattle. Don't care. Fish the oceans into extinction. Don't care. Fish for sharks, lop of their fins and toss them back into the ocean to die for a "delicacy." Don't care. Butcher dolphins because they compete against you for fish. Don't care. Hunt rhinos into extinction for some "miracle" bunion powder. Don't care. Kill off everything but the cats, the dogs, the pigs, and the cows. They aren't beneficial to us anyways.
-
5 回复由Recon Number 54编辑: 5/25/2013 7:00:58 PMWaiting for fusion. A fusion plant near the ocean (where it will use it's own power to electrolyze the water in order to produce its own deuterium fuel) will have a byproduct of many thousand cubic yards of hydrogen and oxygen. That hydrogen can then either be utilized as fuel or recombined with the oxygen (in a pure reaction) that results in perfectly sterile and distilled water. Even if we don't develop fusion in time, we could use any relatively clean energy source in that sort of farm. Combine: Clean Energy (in decreasing efficiency. Fusion, Fission, Tidal, Solar, Wind) Electrolysis of seawater Skim off Deuterium for Fusion usage/research Use hydrogen as a mobile fuel and/or.. Use the hydrogen/oxygen on site for more energy production Collect the water from the above for a nearly unlimited supply of clean water.
-
by then, they can just just suck up all the water in the ocean and turn it into water. Just me theres all ready inventions that fix most of these problems, but organisations buy them and are never heard of again. It will still be war for Power and Land, nothing more.
-
2 回复由RighteousTyrant编辑: 5/25/2013 4:01:42 PM
-
Humanity has always been good about adjusting and adapting to the world in times of extreme difficulty even when we are on the cusp of disaster, the way you have to look at it is get involved and odd hat you can with your own power or trust that there are good people in the world able to do that for you so you don't have to. But if you cant change anything then live your life honorably and do what you can!
-
1 回复It's crazy how we've known that we are destroying the planet, but do very little to prevent it at all. If War won't kill us, pollution will.
-
1 回复
-
由SecondClass编辑: 5/25/2013 3:41:21 PM
-
1 回复I have an idea. We could build nuclear power plants on the coasts of our cooler regions (e.g. Alaska, Iceland, etc.) to ensure that the chances of overheating/natural disasters are significantly reduced. If we ran cooling coils through the ocean coasts in those regions, we would have not only a natural coolant, but also a way to quickly evaporate the water. Not only would there be zero pollutants (in this process, specifically), but it would kill two birds with one stone. If the heat from the coils "steamed" the water into large containers, we would have a method of cleanly converting salt water to fresh water. We would also have a relatively clean form of energy (i.e. nuclear). If we could recycle the nuclear waste, we would have a pretty solid system going.
-
1 回复I live in a damn desert and we don't have water shortages? Colorado river? You know.. the one they say is shrinking.. yet has been exactly the same as it has 10 years ago?
-
2 回复[quote]Experts say some 3,800 cubic kilometres of fresh water are extracted from aquatic ecosystems around the world each year, partly as a result of global warming.[/quote] Wouldn't this just make more rain? Its not like the water vanishes from existence....
-
I think it's hilarious that people were so stupid and uncaring that we've screwed over our access to undoubtedly the most precious resource on the planet. And it's even funnier that people can't get it into their heads, and get their act straight. Boy am I glad to live in the middle of nowhere.