{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
12/6/2015 9:34:45 AM
7
Here is my view: all the evidence and support provided is theoretical in impact and scope. We can assume climate change may or may not exist. Which I think the current popular understanding of climate change [u]does not[/u] exist. We cannot however begin to fathom what may occur from something we aren't sure about when it comes to national policy.
English
-
You misunderstand me. The [u]popularized[/u] theory is the climate state is changing due to entirely human machinations. I'm arguing that humanity has made a remarkably small change to the climate when earthly orbital cycles account for far more than man can ever produce or account for. The milankovitch cycles explain far more than simple emissions. All the studies you are mentioning are popular because of current political alignments that in no way is representative of the science community. Read the study by D. H. Tarling for starters.
-
由Britton编辑： 12/6/2015 10:06:28 PMThe studies ive given are about how climate change will affect global politics. Are actual contribution to whats causing climate change is a small but a necessary part of a positive feedback loop that our actions are helping sustain.
-
Only insofar as climate does indeed shift. However, there is little to no evidence of an impact by humans on climate shifts. No one seems to get that the earth has natural warming and cooling cycles explained through paradigm shifts in the milankovitch cycles. Mathematically it has accounted for nearly all climate change scenarios.
-
So you only look at some studies then immediately form your opinion? If you do real research and don't simply seek out that which agreed with your views you wouldn't be so sure of yourself not what you claim to know. You feign knowledge when all you have done is read what you already believe in.
