The Department of Defense
http://www.defense.gov/News-Article-View/Article/612710
[quote]Global climate change will aggravate problems such as poverty, social tensions, environmental degradation, ineffectual leadership and weak political institutions that threaten stability in a number of countries[/quote][quote]The report finds that climate change is a security risk, Pentagon officials said, because it degrades living conditions, human security and the ability of governments to meet the basic needs of their populations. Communities and states that already are fragile and have limited resources are significantly more vulnerable to disruption and far less likely to respond effectively and be resilient to new challenges, they added.[/quote]
CIA and Department of Homeland Security
http://www.homelandsecuritynewswire.com/dr20121112-ciacommissioned-climate-change-report-outlines-perils-for-u-s-national-security
[quote] the accelerating pace of climate change will place severe strains on U.S. military and intelligence agencies in coming years; the reason, according the National Research Council, the U.S. top scientific research body: climate changes will trigger increasingly disruptive developments around the world; a 206-page National Research Council study, commissioned by the CIA and other U.S. intelligence services, concludes that states will fail, large populations subjected to famine, flood, or disease will migrate across international borders, and national and international agencies will not have the capacity or resources to cope with the resulting conflicts and crises[/quote]
Study of climate change and the effect of the Syrian Drought.
http://m.pnas.org/content/112/11/3241
[quote]There is evidence that the 2007−2010 drought contributed to the conflict in Syria. It was the worst drought in the instrumental record, causing widespread crop failure and a mass migration of farming families to urban centers. Century-long observed trends in precipitation, temperature, and sea-level pressure, supported by climate model results, strongly suggest that anthropogenic forcing has increased the probability of severe and persistent droughts in this region, and made the occurrence of a 3-year drought as severe as that of 2007−2010 2 to 3 times more likely than by natural variability alone. We conclude that human influences on the climate system are implicated in the current Syrian conflict.[/quote]
This really shouldn't be a partisan issue. To continue to play this issue as a right/left argument is simply absurd, and is only indicative of ulterior motives.
-
1 回复由Vicex编辑: 12/7/2015 12:38:47 PMDoes the report mention which states will fail, or when given present trends? Frankly through, it will never be bipartisan issue because of special interest groups... and the disturbing ability of Congress to see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil...when it comes to scientific advisors telling them how -blam!-ed up the world is going to get... because we all know a high school biology course is sufficient to have an option on such issues.
-
7 回复LMFAO Britton. I know you are just saying all this because your savior Bernie Sanders said this dumbass shit but please pull your head out of his ass and get a breath of fresh air every once in a while You say to continue playing this left right is absurd yet you almost ONLY side with the left
-
2 回复
-
WINTER IS COMING but for real though eventually the earth will have the same rotation the moon does now due to tidal forces so it is very obvious things change. Sorry, humanity, if the nature of earth does not evolve into 72 degree weather year around with one day of rain per week. My main point being that... Yeah... We're gonna have to adapt to our environment, just as our environment adapts to us.... Be ready, at some point, to see a dramatic shift, just as we have dramatically shifted the nature in massive pockets of earth's surface that we call "cities" Just... Prepare like things won't ever be as nice as they are today unless you supply yourself with knowledge and technology and you'll have the advantage in life.
-
3 回复由Darkseid编辑: 12/7/2015 1:45:12 AM
-
2 回复由KingInYellow315编辑: 12/7/2015 2:20:41 AM
-
26 回复Global warming doesn't exist: it's a fabrication to keep the rich, rich, and the poor, poor. Capitalism leads to economic progress. What's a byproduct of capitalism? Higher CO2 emissions. Restricting those in turn restricts capitalism and economic progress.
-
1 回复由GoFish75编辑: 12/6/2015 11:44:50 PM
-
2 回复Stop it. Your filthy commie facts are hurting my brain. We just need to give God some freedomz.
-
1 回复
-
19 回复Nothing you can do will deter these idiots, they'll just keep spouting off about how the scientists are wrong and their opinion is right. Don't even try.
-
2 回复The post climate change will destroy the world What I though " oh great this -blam!-ing shit again ooooohh myyyyy gooood what a waste of time the climate will change and there is nothing the human race can do to stop that it's not like cavemen lighting fires got us out of the ice age this shit is just used by every -blam!-wit politician that includes it in their platform and is never even touched during their term I mean really I can't believe people actually buy into this shit after global cooling, then global warming, and now climate change? Oh come on it's just some bullshit to get some manipulative asshat more votes because you think she/he will actually do something. Honestly it's like people don't take government classes in high school for -blam!-s sake." Really
-
7 回复Here is my view: all the evidence and support provided is theoretical in impact and scope. We can assume climate change may or may not exist. Which I think the current popular understanding of climate change [u]does not[/u] exist. We cannot however begin to fathom what may occur from something we aren't sure about when it comes to national policy.
-
15 回复由OurWildebeest编辑: 12/6/2015 4:27:08 PMBritton: http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/publications/reports/an-abrupt-climate-change-scena/ Please download and open the PDF linked from this page. It is a 2003 Pentagon report about planning for an abrupt climate change scenario. See page 9. Have any of those scenarios come true? Or even close? To be fair, they are "what ifs," not firm predictions. But you wouldn't wargame this stuff if you didn't think it might happen. Why are these predictions always wrong once the predicted dates have come and gone, and why will current or future predictions be right? The X factor is that the federal government wants to get bigger. If people are afraid of climate change destroying the world, they will give more money to government to fix it.
-
1 回复