{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
4/16/2018 9:28:09 AM
14
I leave any matches where my connection to the host is poor and they win 1 on 1 gunfights because they are a second in front of me. Everyone should only play matches where they are the host. -blam!- losing to lag
English
-
You do realize that if everyone only played matches where they were the host. No one would actually be playing each other?
-
He said where connection to host is poor. Unfortunately, this is tough to do as not even a net duma can make this consistent.
-
Maybe if you read his entire post you would understand which sentence I was refering to.
-
I did. I was giving the benefit of the doubt instead of being negative. Give it shot sometime. Have a good day.
-
Actually one could easily argue that you had a knee-jerk reaction to me pointing out a logical flaw in a statement. Effectvely meaning I was simply constructive and you were the one that decided to look to my constructive feedback as negative. Your comment also seems to indicate that I am misrepresenting what was said, when it is clear to everyone that I did not.
-
[quote]Actually one could easily argue that you had a knee-jerk reaction to me pointing out a logical flaw in a statement. Effectvely meaning I was simply constructive and you were the one that decided to look to my constructive feedback as negative. Your comment also seems to indicate that I am misrepresenting what was said, when it is clear to everyone that I did not.[/quote] Get a room you two !
-
You are absolutely right. I’ve been duped into arguing with an elitist deuce on the internet. I’m going to go take a timeout for being a child.
-
And who are you?
-
You are trying really hard to be right. So you win. Have a good day.
-
There is no trying involved. I simply stated a fact.
-
Here are some facts. Two conflicting points were made in the OP. One was possible, they other was not. Some people can read in context and some can’t. All facts.
-
I fail to see how that is relevant to your involvement in this discussion. I simply pointed out how a sentence was logically flawed. I even went so far as to phrase it as a question. Because as far as I know, EmeraldArchon, is trying to be funny. I. e. the point of the illogical argument could be to say that no one should be playing the game at all. Then you jump down my throat about negativity. Effectively painting this whole discussion in a different light. And yes you still try to paint my question as misrepresentation, when it uses the exact same words as EmeraldArchon stated them. That little jib about people's ability to understand context is also hilariously ironic. Somehow I doubt you will see that though. Which makes it even more ironic.
-
Deep breaths
-
And why do you assume I am stressing out? I am only making objective observations. What specifically makes you read my statements as aggressive?
