[quote]GLENDALE, Ariz. -
A shoplifting suspect pulled a gun on an unarmed loss prevention officer at the Arrowhead Towne Center mall and shots were fired, but not by the suspects or security -- a bystander.
According to Glendale Police Sgt. Jay O'Neill, the investigation revealed that two suspects, a male and female had entered the Sears store located near the Loop 101 and Bell Road and were in the process of shoplifting. As they left the store's upper level, they were approached by the officer, who attempted to detain them. That's when the female suspect got a handgun from a backpack and pointed it towards the direction of the officer.
Meanwhile, a 61-year-old male who was sitting in a vehicle outside of the mall waiting on his wife who was inside the store saw what was happening and came to the aid of the officer. At the same time, the man saw his 64-year-old wife exiting the store from the same area as the officer.
"Fearing for the safety of his wife and the loss prevention officer, the male fired his handgun an unknown number of times toward the armed suspect. There are witnesses who indicate that either one or more of the shoplifting suspects may have been hit by the gunfire. Both of the shoplifting suspects then got onto a black motorcycle and fled the area," stated O'Neill.
Police officers later found a motorcycle in a nearby apartment complex that matched the description of the suspect motorcycle and they're investigating the possibility that it may be involved in this case. It wasn't registered to that location it's not known at this time if it belonged to a resident or abandoned.
The suspects are described as a white male, wearing a black t-shirt and black baseball cap, and a white female, wearing a blue tank top under a black hooded jacket, carrying a blue and gray backpack. The motorcycle was described as a black sport bike.
After an extensive check of the area and apartment complex located in the 17600 block of N. 79th Avenue, police did not find the suspects.
O'Neill says at this point, it's unknown if charges will be filed against the man who fired shots towards the armed suspect.
"This incident took place outside of the mall and there was never any closure of the mall, or the Sears store other than in the immediate vicinity of the incident," stated O'Neill. "We are also unable to confirm whether or not either of the shoplifting suspects were struck by gunfire from the bystander and at this point in the investigation have no definitive information in either direction."[/quote]
Wonder why I have not seen this on CNN or MSNBC. They always say stuff like to report on the times when scumbags use guns for crime but never when a responsible gun owner saves lives
English
#Offtopic
-
Edited by Fallen Hero: 1/7/2014 6:41:36 PMHe should have known his weapons range. From what I've read he didn't hit his target once which means he either needs more practice or he doesn't know his weapons range. It seems the criminals didn't notice him he should have gotten closer before unloading.
-
>FOX >Arizona >Trigger happy idiot fires an "unknown number" of shots in direct vicinity of innocent people. Somehow is called a hero. Could this shit get any more biased?
-
Edited by brandorobot: 1/7/2014 2:12:18 PMThe guy is lucky he didn't hit anyone else. When I read "an unknown number of shots fired" it seems like this guy just started unloading in their direction. In reality he actually increased the risk of someone getting shot by opening fire like that. Preventing someone shoplifting and causing a homicide isn't really a good trade off.
-
7 RepliesIts more like this: >Officer was busy getting all the details and most likely stalling suspects till police arrives >Bystander sees what is happening >Instead of calling 911, proceeds to greatly risk chance of a hostage situation. Luckily it wasn't. >Bystander, by the evidence, shoots out of range, inappropriate for current situation, and greatly risks killing everyone including the officer. >Suspect gets away before police arrives and little info is gathered The bystander did not respond correctly to the situation and could've gotten himself, the officer, and others innocents in way of bullets killed. Had he called 911, informed them of the situation,and inform them if they took off on motorcycle that by the time police arrives they would've had a great chance of catching the suspects. And the suspects could've immediately shot the officer after the bystander engaged them or held someone hostage. I do not see this as a crime averted but a screw up.
-
The Police gunna take is freedumbs away!!!
-
2 RepliesWhy do people even bother to take this idiot and his bait seriously?
-
5 RepliesThat bias, though.
-
17 RepliesThe bias is dripping so much from this "article". I should get start carrying buckets when I see people posting political topics to catch all that bias.
-
3 RepliesYour posts just seem to be getting more and more extreme.
-
11 RepliesOh man, I bet untrained civilians would do a better job at keeping the peace than a dedicated police force!
-
2 RepliesBut didn't a gun owner cause the crime?
-
18 Replies1. Shit source. 2. That's not preventing crime, it is reacting to it. 3. It is entirely possible that he could have killed someone innocent in the process. Not every vigilante is batman, humans make frequent mistakes, especially society encourages the crowd sourcing of police intervention or investigation. 4. It's a highly specific scenario that has little to do with the overall trend of gun related deaths.
-
1 Reply[quote]Wonder why I have not seen this on CNN or MSNBC.[/quote]Because it isn't news, you dolt. "[x] worked just the way it was supposed to. Now, sports."
-
G8 b8 m8
-
To be fair, there are thousands of shootings every year that aren't reported by CNN or MSNBC.
-
1 ReplyArrowhead Mall? That's like a 8 minute drive from where I live D:
-
Notice how everyone claiming bias make no point at all? Ya, they've NEVER posted anything biased!
-
Good for them!
-
2 RepliesNeed more details to know if this was a good thing or bad thing. It could easily swing both ways.