{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
4/24/2021 12:44:58 AM
1
For the Apple XDR display,
https://www.amazon.com/Apple-MWUG2LL-A-Pro-Stand/dp/B082LQSZB8
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07Q79ZZJ6/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o06_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1&tag=mrforums-20
$29.95 vs $1000 oh don't forget the Vesa mount if you want to go 3rd party which will cost another $200 from Apple.
Not sure if you understand my point, but don't really have an interest to look any deeper then the 5 minutes I spent looking this up lol.
English
-
Edited by Ares: 4/24/2021 12:52:03 AMI'm seeing a third party stand and an apple oe stand? Unsure if that's what you meant to link but if it is, you don't understand my point at all and are arguing something totally different - which is the price difference between two different brands making a similar product.
-
Edited by Talathiel: 4/24/2021 1:30:27 AMMy point is that there have been monitor stands around forever ( not "literally" forever just a figure of speech ) but Apple will still inflate their prices to that degree because they know people will still pay that huge markup just to have the Apple logo. 29.95 x 750% = $224.63 The markup for the Apple stand over 3rd party is over 3300% I know what you are saying and I agree. A company pulling a 750% markup on their own product is nothing but greed, and I'm sure I could find another example if I wanted to look hard enough. What I'm saying is Apple knew there were stands out there for under $100 that were good but still marked up their own stand ( by over 3300% in the example I used ) because they knew the "Brand Fans" would still buy it regardless of price. And that is the exact same greed Bungie is showing here. Also my first comment was supposed to be more of a throw-away shitpost comment lol.
