why should I guild challenges?

[quote]PvE & PvP would have 77 challenges each. The categories would be separated like our triumphs page. You could opt in to do one, the other or both. A possible reward for doing both may be a title that you can gild but with a twist. (You can only gild once per season, this gild doesn't reset however, it caps out at six gilds at the sixth gild you can choose any available color for it.) It's not about getting a title however this is just so some of the PvE players stop complaining about having to do PvP and Vice versa. Honestly it's like watching two girls pulling each others hair then their parents saying if those two don't stop they'll turn this car around and go home. Absolutely riveting content [spoiler]Not.[/spoiler] Edit: I care not that I need PvP or PvE for these, I'm just sick of the pointless arguments between some of the PvE and PvP community, it's not all of you I know just some of you.[/quote] Only if you get twice the amount of BD if you do both sides. But then people will cry about that. This will never end. System is fine how it is. Likely, the two grace challenges that can be skipped were to account for GM and trials since not everyone does those.

If you’re allowed to do both, people will whine that the other is “forced” still. This basically does nothing other than add more challenges and I guess give you access to the 75 challenge reward. Literally if there’s any reward behind PvP, PvE players will complain. People need to just resign themselves to the fact that if you don’t play everything, you don’t earn everything. There are plenty of adequate alternatives available elsewhere.

PvP and PvE challenges are no issue for me but once they ask me to play gambit I contemplate logging off.

I’m just here to watch the try hards turn into cry hards. They always do when people ask for options even though it wouldn’t affect them at all.