Gambit Prime takes too long and there’s too much invading.
-
They should either fix the "catch up" mechanics in Prime or get rid of it for regular Gambit. There's no reason for a team that has used their invasions and gets their primeval first to get back/back/back invasions after summoning their Primeval first. That defies the logic of "catch up". Neither though should the team that's behind get what seems like infinite invasions when the opposition has their Primeval up. That's rewarding a team for sucking. So they should either fix it or eliminate Gambit Prime.
-
Nah prime is faster and, honestly more interesting
-
prime is faster , but third round in regular is the best fun in all of gambit. it is a pure race to dps and invade as fast and effectively as possible.
-
1 ReplyI would prefer a combination of Gambit and Prime. I like Gambit's boss fights and more motes to summon prime evil but up to 3 rounds is a bit too long. I like Primes one round but the boss fight can take too long due to damage stack buff rounds and leaves too much room for come backs due to frequent invasions delaying boss kill. I think if Prime requires 125 to 150 motes and spawns 3 random normal Gambit prime evil one after another would make matches more more interesting and go by quicker. No more damage buff phases just quick boss melts. Each boss killed has an RNG chance to drop Gambit & Prime loot. This would also increase chances for players who have yet to get the Malfeasance exotic quest from the Meatball boss along with the sparrow and ship drop rates per match. The Dredgen title wouldn't be as overly difficult to get due to RNG and guardians not using the supers frequently. I think these types of changes would make Gambit feel more rewarding in general along with matches not feeling so long.
-
Nah, Prime is better.
-
Just remove the drifter and gambit completely
-
Definitely not. They made gambit free to all players so saying “you know what you’re going to be at a disadvantage for not having an annual pass” would go against that move. Then if you are thinking they should add armor to gambit, then you are devaluing the annual pass since you are making literally an entire season F2P, which could be an option down the line, but I don’t see Bungie doing it yet. People will be coming for new light, and those who want to dive into Forsaken probably will purchase the pass.
-
Also, keep regular gambit the way it is except increase the motes needed to summon the boss to 100, and make it 1 round. 1 and done, win or lose.
-
4 RepliesRemove Prime Improve Classic Destroy the armor
-
Make the armor drop from the game mode then.
-
2 RepliesKeep Both. One is like a quickplay gambit and one is like comp....kinda lol. Why get rid of them? More game modes to choose is a great thing? KEEP BOTH GAMBITS BUNGIE!
-
Remove gambit fixed it
-
Agreed
-
Maybe there is a hybrid of both that they can keep, bc I honestly like regular over Prime.
-
I don't like prime, the repetition of killing envoys just gets boring
-
Remove both.
-
I would rather have Prime if we only get to keep one.
-
1 ReplyKeep both, remove all the bots
-
FreK NO, regular gambit suck azz. Cheesy catch up mechanics and it just lasts entirely too long. Invader issues and a broken Power economy. Gambit Prime is hands down the obvious optimal Game Mode of the two.
-
Should scrap both the illicit and outlaw sets kinda pointless to have due to the notorious one and takes up space
-
Prime is faster by far and invading is only a problem when your team mates kill the third wizard when they know an invader is either present or imminent and stand shooting the boss like they're invisible and die while I sit shaking my head at the screen.
-
Gambit Prime is waaaaay faster.
-
Gambit prime is actually faster
-
Classic Gambit needs to be removed.
-
I agree it seems regular gambit goes quicker then one prime match
-
1 ReplyHeeeeeeeeeeeeeeell no. Regular is worse bro. Three rounds? With that said I don't have a dog in this race because I hate Gambit.