{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Reign of Bane:
8/11/2015 11:53:35 PM
106
Master Chief's armour In Halo 4 looks terrible..
....why does it look different? Is something some people have said.
Though it looks different cosmetically apparently it's not a different type of armour. He still wearing the same armour from Halo 3 (MKVI) in Halo 4.
When Chief was in stasis aboard the Forward Unto Dawn, nano-bots repaired his armour under Cortana's direction which altered its appearance.
This makes sense but what do you think and did you like it in Halo 3 or Halo 4 more? (it's the same armour I mean aesthetically).
-
1 ReplyThe armor in halo 4 made the game that much better he looks more futuristic and more of a tank look to him
-
1 ReplyHalo 4 its got more detail. But not super distateful ass cutlets and square enix type shit
-
Umm.. You know graphics improve a lot in 5 years.
-
I think I'm the only one who prefers CE's armor... But anyways, to me, I like Halo 4's in the sense that it isn't awful but I feel that it doesn't look complete, like pieces of it are slapped on here and there.
-
16 RepliesEverything in Halo 4 was terrible.
-
4 RepliesI can't be the only one who thinks it looks awesome. Helmet looks way better than the last, and the extra detail they've added is a welcome addition. To hell with lore and consistency.
-
Edited by Astrachalasia: 9/1/2015 8:31:48 PMI don't give a shit about the armor, but I was pissed when they made him a new helmet. His old one is legendary. [b]Edit:[/b] I still love the new armor, but I just prefer that helmet more.
-
2 RepliesAfter seeing that badass looking H3 beam rifle, the H4 variation looked like AIDS
-
10 RepliesEdited by Kankunation: 8/12/2015 3:24:00 AMThere is a few things about the armor that debunks the whole nanobots thing. The biggest one being- -if nanobots spend 4 years repairing his armor and reconfiguring the layout and design, why would they leave the huge gash in the top-right breast plate? It's a huge oversight in the whole theory. There is also the fact that the no VI armor wasn't supposed to have nanobots. That was a design feature that was planned the the mark VII armor and was not previously in any of the other mjolnir variants. So unless they were hanging out in the cryo pod it makes no sense [spoiler] (though I guess they might have been hanging around the ship. Perhaps they are the same ones that made the half frigate grow 3 times in size, and the same ones that gave said ship a nuke that could easily take out a covie cruiser that had it sits shields down because plot convenience.) [/spoiler]
-
I liked his armor in 4 and 5 looks good as well (from the pics I've seen)
-
1 ReplyEdited by Onxide: 9/1/2015 5:04:05 PMHe looks more like a super-soldier in it IMO.
-
1 ReplyI like 3 more for chief's armor. I think the Spartan armor in reach looks pretty good though.
-
1 ReplyI thought I was the only one who thought it was -blam!-ing ugly.
-
2 RepliesEdited by Boomdeyadah: 8/29/2015 7:54:12 AMThe shoulders were literally the worst change 343 did to Chief. Unneccesasry bulkiness that looks like it was attached on the armor, rather than being part of the armor.
-
1 ReplyHalo 4 in general is terrible
-
5 RepliesIt wasn't too bad but I definately liked the Halo 3 armor more. 343 for some reason felt the need to ra[b][/b]pe his armor with pixels just because they could. 343 needs to follow the armor art style of Halo Reach closer. The Mjolnir Mk. 6 armor type in Reach looked great!
-
5 RepliesI'm happy that Chief looks more proportioned now. He looks like an armored human now, as opposed to looking like a human-shaped armor. The more green coloring, the improved undersuit design, and the gold visor make Chief's Halo 5 armor look much better than the Halo 4 design.
-
No, it's the same. If it was repaired the scratch on his chest would be gone. At least I'd hope so after four years. It looks different mainly because 343 took to the little chance of creativity, that explaining why both master chief and the grunts look so different. As for the jackals and elites, that's a different story. But it's mostly due to design change with the different company making their own game from the ground up.
-
I disagree ALOT!!!
-
I dis like the sholders and how it looks in gameplay. Cutscenes looked good tho
-
I dont mind it. just wish they a gave a better excuse for it.
-
1 Replylooks 10x as cool as anything in the other games
-
1 ReplyI liked it tbh
-
1 ReplyHalo 4 armor is unnecessarily bulky and detailed in the wrong way and the wrong places. It's just ugly. Spartan 4's are jus -blam!-ing hideous.
-
8 RepliesI've always wondered why his armor was magically different between the two games. Didn't know there was an actual reason behind it
-
1 ReplyI actually like it, I just hate the awful explanation of how it magically changed in stasis. Then again compared with the H4 ending it's not a bad explanation.
