{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
2/14/2014 7:31:01 AM
13
-
-
Sorry for seeing the game for what it is.
-
I disagree on some of choices that Zenimax has made especially the monthly subscription but I'm still going to play the game. If you can't afford £9 a month you've got more important things to worry about than playing games.
-
I can afford the fee. But the game would have to be worth it for me to pay £120 a year to play it. It's not worth it, so I'm not paying for it.
-
Edited by Oddball: 2/14/2014 11:22:06 PMOpinions are opinions.
-
Edited by nao: 2/14/2014 8:05:49 PM>isn't a total money grab >f2p :|
-
Edited by BannedLemön: 2/14/2014 11:02:46 PMIt's a money grab. And it'll become F2P by the end of the year because of how bad it'll bomb.
-
Just because it has a monthly subscription doesn't mean it's going to fail.
-
Edited by nao: 2/14/2014 11:08:54 PMWuz pointing out how most f2p games are money grabs. Doubt it'll go f2p by end of year, but we'll see.
-
The difference is that they're optional. And many F2P games do it better than the pay-to-play MMOs. i.e. GW2
-
Edited by nao: 2/14/2014 11:22:04 PMGw2 is b2p. Which is the best model imo. LoL would be a good example of a f2p done right. Yea it's technically optional, but we're seeing more and more p2w games. I find a sub preferable to f2p. Means more and better content.
-
[quote]Means more and better content.[/quote]Not really.
-
Edited by nao: 2/14/2014 11:37:59 PMMostly I've found that it does. If it doesn't in a particular case then that's when I stop paying the sub. Don't know if ESO will be worth keeping the sub yet, but I'll give it a try.
