{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/7/2013 4:34:58 PM
21
How is a poorly worded post on the internet (with absolutely nothing to back it up) indicative of fact?
English
-
And here he is leaking the 360 details back in 05, and he was.100% correct
-
Because the GAF mods back him, considering GAF requires approval to even be a [i]member[/i] i'd say this guy is the real thing. Like I said, he posts like that so its harder to find him and so he cant be sourced.
-
It really doesn't matter who backs him. no sauces = suspect. Anandtech did a complete dismantling and breakdown of the One right after it's reveal and didn't find any of this. Anandtech also properly sources their material. I'll trust Anandtech over this douchebag.
-
Anandtech breaks down one console. This on a mass production scale. MS wants 7 working consoles for every ten, they're only getting 4. Lets not forget that MS' entire presentation was a lie. A powerpoint, the actual software.is much much unresponsive.
-
Which if you had read their article and not skimmed it, you would see that they directly compare the guts to the PS4 which they broke down earlier. Also, it doesn't matter if they break down one XBO or seventy. The guts inside each one are the same. When put through a performance test, the exact same parts will perform the exact same way every time. That's science. Anything else you want to bullshit out without sources?
-
Edited by BerzerkCommando: 6/7/2013 11:47:44 PMhttp://www.gamespot.com/news/xbox-360-failure-rate-237-ps3-10-wii-27-study-6216691 If that's true then why did the 360 have that 23.7% failure rate out of those 16,000? By going with what you said all of those 16,000 should have failed.
-
By that logic the 360 should have worked perfectly for everyone.
-
I can randomly state "facts" and conspiracies too.
-
so you're going to tell me the same guy who leaked the 360 details 8 years ago doesn't have any credibility?
-
No, not really.
-
I'm talking about you, I read the entire link. No proof that it was power point, nowhere is your little "4 of 10" statement mentioned.
-
That's just an idea behind the yield rate. i don't know the actual numbers, they're not producing what they want. it was an example
-
So you admit that you're full of bullshit then? That makes arguments much easier, I do say.
-
No, the 4/10 is a rough estimate based on the information provided by cboat who has been around for quite awhile. now, if you'll excuse me, i got to go to work
-
No, the point is that you quoted someone posting a baseless rumor and are trying to justify it based off of what he said seven or eight years before that. Your source has no sources and therefore zero credibility, and you're defending it? That's ignorant.
-
Try reading and thinking.
-
I did. Poorly worded and trash rumors do not a credible source make.
-
Edited by Dylan is Grump: 6/7/2013 9:51:53 PMits poorly worded for a reason. he doesn't want the info to be tracked to his actual persons. he has done this for the past 8 years. who's he supposed to source? an insider is the goddamned source.
-
Sure. Sure that's the reason and he's not full of bullshit. You can't see it, but I'm rolling my eyes.
-
[url=http://www.expertreviews.co.uk/games/1302277/xbox-one-console-production-issues-could-lead-to-shortages]Dinner is served[/url]
-
Sure doesn't seem like you bothered reading it. "Trash rumors", seems like emotions/feelings are clouding your judgment.
