{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
2/3/2013 12:37:41 PM
2
The beta and closed alphas were disappointing to me. Input lag, graphics are disappointing (and now, my PC is running Ultra with about 65 frames), and it's the same as Crysis 2.
English
-
Wait, you're actually [i]complaining[/i] that you're getting a 60+ frame rate? Judge the graphics by how good they are, not whether or not your PC can handle them. I also take it you're talking about Very High, as neither the Alpha nor Beta have had an Ultra setting. And how is it the same as Crysis 2? The movement's been fixed, stealth is fixed, hit detection is 100x better... I could go on. It's what Crysis 2 should have been.
-
I'm not whining about the 65 frames, I put that in there because if I whined about graphics somebody would run in and state that my computer sucked. The problem I have with the graphics is that they're worse than Crysis 1 and the same as 2, and if anything, the polycount has decreased (type `, type .polycount), and it looks really bland and seems to include green, gray, and gray tinted colors. Also, setting for me say Ultra, I have the game in Dutch. The game is honestly the same as Crysis 2, minus the crossbow and the awesome change to energy. Although I'm glad they fixed a lot, so much is broken and so much does not function well on the PC I wonder if Crytek even tested this game on the PC at all. No changes were made since early alphas to the current beta (I was an alpha tester for this game, NDA is over, I'm allowed to say I am). Finally, movement fixed? Input lag still exists.
