WASHINGTON, D.C.—In his opening statement at Trump's impeachment trial, Rep. Adam Schiff reminded the Senate of their solemn duty and the gravity of just what it is they will be discussing at the trial.
Schiff warned that if Trump is not impeached, the American people may have a chance to tamper with the next election.
"If President Trump is not impeached, the American people might get a say in who is president," Schiff said gravely. "We simply can't allow that to happen. We must diligently defend our electoral process against electoral outcomes we do not like. If that means seizing power through a sham impeachment trial, so be it."
"When the Founders wrote that founding document thing, they never imagined there would be electoral outcomes that Democrats did not agree with."
Democrats also said they even have hard evidence that the 2016 election was compromised by Republicans voting for Trump.
"We know this horrible outcome could happen, because it's already happened once before."
https://babylonbee.com/news/democrats-warn-that-american-people-may-tamper-with-next-election
English
#Offtopic
-
The Vulture was way too cool in Spider-Man: Homecoming. They completely ignored the fact that he’s just a weird bald guy in green spandex and bird wings in the comics
-
2 RepliesAdam Schiff - “The President's misconduct cannot be decided at the ballot box. For we cannot be assured that the vote will be fairly won." That’s no Babylon Bee quote, that’s directly from the horse’s ass. So BB isn’t too far from the mark here....
-
Oddly enough, I just got done reading an article that said, in essence, that voting for Trump is racist and should be illegal. I'm paraphrasing but that's the gist of the article and it wasn't satire like yours, the guy that wrote it and the dude he interviewed in it were dead serious.
-
3 RepliesI can't tell if this is satire or reality anymore. I wouldn't be surprised if he actually said this, in private.
-
But Russian collusion or something
-
What if eccho is my alt?
-
Elections🙄[spoiler]appointments is a better belief[/spoiler]
-
1 Reply*tampers tampers tampers tampers
-
Edited by FdYAcsoyPKN83gLE: 1/25/2020 7:05:49 PMYeah, [url=https://www.cnn.com/videos/business/2019/08/10/voting-booth-hack-def-con-orig.cnn-business]they[/url] might. The machines are too old. 0:28
-
1 Reply"It's for your own good, and I cannot hurt you..." 1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. 2. A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. 3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.
-
Since when did that sight drop the satire pieces?
-
Ahahaaa
-
Funi boi
-
Needs more N@zi's
-
Bump for satire [spoiler]baited[/spoiler]
-
3 RepliesThat's funny
-
1 Reply
-