{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by TotallyNotDrew:
9/17/2015 1:02:09 AM
21
When people try to explain why Halo 4 had a great campaign
"But it had character development!"
"But Chief spoke!"
"But look at all my books that aren't useless!"
Edit: I love how people are completely missing the point.
English
#Gaming
-
-
It didn't have the Flood, so I loved it.
-
2 RepliesCharacter development is good Chief speaking is good, no one wants a brick wall as a character You dont even need the books to understand the story
-
No you are missing the point it was a step forward for the franchise and it told a great story and made it more then just about the human covenant war I love how people are still trying to push their views of the game it's been out for 3 years you will not change someone's view on it
-
Don't really care about all that nonsense. It was boring and repetitive as hell
-
I agree. The second, third and fourth level were okay but after that it was just stupid.
-
BUT MUH LORE [spoiler]Too bad the game was shit at everything else[/spoiler]
-
7 RepliesEdited by DW6: 9/17/2015 5:37:38 PMWe get it. You people don't like Halo 4. Edit: wtf? I'm having typos this week.
-
Character development is always a positive, unless it's bad character development. The game itself had some great missions, but it doesn't hold up to the other games in terms of replay ability.
-
5 RepliesBut it did. We actually got forerunners. We actually got emotion. It had content. It had a sense of danger.
-
13 RepliesEdited by GreenW: 9/16/2015 4:03:40 PMWatching like a 10 min video explaining who the iso-diadact is will make the story 1000x cooler
-
1 ReplyYeah! F#%^ character development! Static rules!
-
1 Replyshit b8 so bad in fact you got muted
-
1 ReplyYou forgot to put *sarcasm*
-
2 RepliesHalo 4 was mostly ok. The ending sucked shit. By that I mean the fight with the Didactic was shit. Instead of giving us a epic fight similar to the Tartarus fight in Halo 2 we get a cookie cutter CoD style QTE ending. 343i is lucky that I loved Halo 4's MP.
-
You bring up all good points but present them as negatives.......this is b8 for sure : p
-
12 RepliesCharacter development is a genuinely valid point which isn't bad. At least this time Chief was still a badass and we got to know him more.
-
2 RepliesI hardly ever agree with you, but today is not one of those days. [spoiler]but the campaign wasn't Destiny levels of bad[/spoiler]
-
Edited by Clayman518: 9/16/2015 6:40:48 PM[quote]"But it had character development!"[/quote] Which is extremely important. [quote]"But Chief spoke!"[/quote] Good. [quote]"But look at all my books that aren't useless!"[/quote] They weren't useless to begin with. Most of them were well written and well recieved.
-
3 RepliesThat, and it had some pretty sweet action sequences. And also some awesome visuals in-mission. The story-telling just different, not better nor worse, only a change in perspective and direction.
-
Bad b8 m8
