{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by bmidg44407:
4/23/2016 2:26:30 AM
138
Best place to start invasion in the United States
Conversation being had atm.
The south is off the table. Southerners have been prepping for war all their life.
The coasts... I didnt see it.
My thought was coming down through the Dakotas or Montana. Seems like the least path of resistance.
Edit: Seems the consensus is the Pacific Northwest or California.
Edit: Over 200 replies... I see my friends and I aren't the only ones that have thought about this.
English
#Offtopic
-
As far as the largest domestic terrorist group in the USA is concerned; the PNW.
-
3 RepliesLol @ people who think the south would be unconquerable because they think idiots with small arms can fight toe to toe against a mechanised fighting force.
-
5 RepliesWell the only way an invasion will work is with a very hard initial surprise strike. So I'd say hit the capital first.
-
alaska for fallout irl
-
For people who say hitting california because it's people are pussy's and wouldn't know what to do, your wrong. I live in nor cal and i can tell you almost every family i know owns more weapons than the amount of people in their households, we know how to use them, and many do not follow our strict gun laws ( its not hard to get a 30+ magazine, or full auto weapon illegally ) Believe me when i tell you that no american, regardless of location, would let chinese/russian soldiers take everything we have worked hard to earn, our freedom, and certainly we would not stand idoly by as they -blam!- our wives, mothers, sisters, and daughters. They face a nation where its civilians have more weapons than every other military in the world combined. We would not simply bow down to any superior force and we would be defiant until the end. To put it simple, they face a country of men who will not be ruled.
-
7 RepliesEdited by General Krantz: 4/24/2016 10:11:08 AMWashington DC, since all the military focus will be on that one city, then you can take out the other states easily.
-
1 ReplyNo where. We all have more guns than we do people in our houses. If our neighbors don't have a gun, we have a spare for them to use and we will teach them to use it before any enemy combatants can reach us. There is no place this country can be invaded from.
-
4 RepliesThe Pacific Northwest would be a supremely bad idea for an invasion m8.
-
Minnesota.
-
1 ReplyYou go in through California and they'll welcome you with open arms.
-
3 Replieswhat you do is find the locations of the US nukes and destroy them, then the nuclear powerplants and invade hawaii. then invade alaska and move through canada towards maine.
-
2 RepliesSaginaw, Detroit.
-
2 RepliesIt would honestly a really difficult thing to achieve. The coasts have a lot of armed gangs, the south have a lot of gun happy people, Northern states and the Midwest have a lot armed farms and ranchers who are usually armed.
-
Edited by ICEW1ND: 4/23/2016 10:48:41 PMThrough Alaska, through Canada then down into u.s. mainland
-
Kamikazes to Washington
-
1 ReplyEdited by chriswushere: 4/23/2016 10:29:16 PMSomehow convince the UN to hate the US and gather them up and attack [spoiler]not that effective in my mind tho. It would be hard to get the UN to hate the us[/spoiler]
-
Mexican border Shit people just walk straight in over there already
-
44 RepliesOur coast lines are very well defended, that would have to be done with sheer numbers (China). Next best option would be from the middle north down, but again good luck getting over the coast then down.
-
I'd say the best way would be to come in from canada and going straight into like new york or take over the great lakes. Sure the dakota area would be easier, but what are you really getting out of invading that spot? Not mention the fact that you are effectively giving the USA three sides to attack from. Coming in from canada and straight down to cali might work pretty well too, but I feel like you won't get as much out of it as you would invading the east coast. It would just be a set up for a long campaign to total domination over the US. And that would be really hard to pull off.
-
The toilet
-
Edited by Vicex: 4/23/2016 8:03:50 PMThe only reasonable way in which someone could defeat the US in a war is to prevent the use of nuclear weapons. As soon as a major country is identified as an aggressor against the United States, it's game over and nukes will fly. Therefore, it would have to be a state-sponsored 'independent' group. Obviously, a conventional invasion and war is out of the question. What this group would have to do is target key economic targets. It could be done with conventional bombs, but the most effective means would be biological threats engineered to kill the infected quickly, so that it cannot spread uncontrollably. The objective is to throw the U.S. (Or any theoretical country really) into absolute chaos and let civil disorder do the rest for you. The damage done would cripple the country for years, if not decades.
-
2 RepliesNuke all major cities, then use bio warfare, and chemical. No need for ground troops, just cripple them and make it a wasteland, it will no longer be a world superpower after that. Man i feel cruel.....
-
Illinois [spoiler]Jk don't do it to us[/spoiler]
-
16 RepliesPacific; no. California has naval bases. Only valid way is really through Canada. It's undefended and I don't think we have that many bases up north
-
4 RepliesCanada and Mexico at the same time, make them fight a two front war.
-
16 RepliesTexas, it's totally vulnerable and the civilians are helpless
