{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/8/2016 1:21:33 AM
19
Ah, this community never fails to deliver.
-Guy posts video of extraordinary feat.
-Roughly 45% or better of the replies are belittling remarks about how it's already been done
-Every single one of previously mentioned remarks fail to provide any actual evidence to support their weak rebuttle of "so-and-so did it already" or "I saw *random player* do this weeks/months ago" and usually resort to "look it up on google/youtube" commentary, which ironically they themselves cannot produce.
On a related note, excellent job OP!
English
-
[url=http://youtu.be/_YrzP_ffrqc]Here's the Link[/url] Dated December the 4th 2015
-
And again, as noted below, not hard mode. Valiant effort though, at least you attempted to validate it. Which is more than can be said about the rest.
-
I'm looking for the vid for hard mode now, I know I've seen it done, will post the link when I find it... Not knocking the guy, it's a great feat, but I'm adamant it's been done before
-
You haven't seen it on YouTube because it doesn't exist. There is no way to guarantee someone hasn't done it without posting video. But there is no prior video or public proof of anyone doing it. The stubbornness people have on this subject is strange though not surprising.
-
Hey if you can find one and it's legitimate, by all means go for it. I take no issue with anyone that can at least add validity to their claim. I'm just sick of seeing people not be able to support their claim and default to "I've seen it" or "take my word for it". That's like me saying I'm actually Bill Gates, but just take my word for it haha.
-
Yeah I hear that bro...
-
Also that's normal SMH
-
45% seems like an underestimate.
-
I was trying to be conservative with my estimate and give the benefit of the doubt. Realistically it's probably closer to 95% haha.
-
Edited by KayteeKaboom: 5/8/2016 11:53:46 PMBecause it was streamed dumbass [i]~One Shot Ted[/i]
-
Edited by OurWildebeest: 5/9/2016 3:14:22 PMIt didn't happen. Not sure why some people find this so difficult to comprehend. You are confusing "kill Oryx HM solo" with earlier milestones, "kill Oryx NM solo," "two-man Oryx HM," "damage (but not kill) Oryx HM solo." Rather than assume someone with obviously more info beats your vague memories, you not only insist your vague memories are better, but you are incapable of figuring it out even when it is pointed out to you no such video exists. This thread is a testament to the limits of human rationality.
-
One shot sucka ballbag.
-
And said streamer wouldn't have recorded and posted such an event somewhere because....? :)
-
Well said, i wish this were at the top for the toxic part of the community to read prior to running their suck.
-
Yeah, but knowing them, they'd just reply with "so-and-so said this months ago" and the fail to link the post lol.
-
They always do... Never ends.
-
Could not agree more. "Someone did this on normal, so you aren't first," as if they are the same thing. If they were, the guy who did it on normal could have done the same thing on hard, but he didn't. Good job, OP. Don't let the toxic kids of the community get you down. There are still some decent people here.
-
Edited by AscendantPotato: 5/8/2016 5:50:13 PMNot to mention the fact that pre-update it was impossible to stagger oryx, so the fella who posted elsewhere in this thread "he should have done it when the cap was 320" and was making a big scene about it, as well as anyone agreeing with that thought process, is extremely dense in the head. So are the people failing to recognize the difference between doing this on normal and hard mode.
-
This. ^^^
