{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
2/20/2016 12:24:33 AM
43
Best setting for Battlefield 5
I honestly would be fine with a world war 2 game considering how most BF fans want that. But then again a Bf5 in the future with modern graphics would also be pretty bad ass, also the potential for vehicles and weapons is almost unlimited. World war 2 would be epic but less vehicles and automatic weapons.
English
#Gaming
-
There are a lot of players saying that they don't want another ww2 game because it was done a lot in the past . But correct me if I'm wrong ,the last time a popular fps ( COD,battlefield, Medal of Honor etc) did a world war theme game was close to 10 years ago ,that's a long time ...A lot of younger gamers may have only been 5 or 6 at the time and never really got to play them , and even the older players who did have waited a while for another one
-
Go back to WW2 because honestly the whole gaming population is tired of the future. Or Vietnam! I miss playing Bad Company 2 Vietnam
-
I just want Bad Company 3.
-
All futuristic games are poo. After playing modern age games, lackluster ww2 guns and vehicles would not have a big gun selection like bf4. Present tense would feel almost like bf4 all over again. But back to future sterf, yea you could do ALOT more things with made up building and guns and vehicles but there isn't really any new concepts for any of those things, you feel me.
-
3 RepliesEdited by Crucifix: 2/21/2016 2:56:54 PMUPDATED: how about battlefield 1861? If you get premium it will take 1 less minute to reload
-
1 ReplyIf it was set in any past time period it would not be called battlefield 5........
-
I would love a WWII FPS.
-
1 ReplyBattlefield: conquest medieval warfare!
-
2020 ftw
-
2 RepliesPls sci fi. That'd be so cool in Battlefield.
-
6 RepliesThey'll no doubt keep it modern again, but it needs spicing up, I don't want another Battlefield 4.5.
-
WW2 ! Bump
-
2 RepliesEdited by Crucifix: 2/21/2016 1:46:15 AMUPDATE: Note that the whatever way DICE goes, it soon will become an over used concept, I mean there's battalion:1944 coming out, and I bet you the next COD will be world war 2, so soon there's gonna be a ton a world war2 games. Considering how I've never played a future battlefield, I'm kind of more interested in a future setting( if you couldn't already tell). Plus final stand was by far my favorite BF4 DLC and I would love to see an entire game with maps like that in modern graphics
-
3 RepliesEdited by Kankunation: 2/21/2016 12:08:11 AMWorld war 2 is boring and was far overdone in the past. Futuristic is unneccessary and while 2142 was great we don't really need a sequel. Cold-war era or modern is the best option.preferably bad company 3
-
I like the modern setting the best, but I wouldn't mind another WWII Battlefield
-
-
3 RepliesI'd rather have a futuristic one. Played enough modern/ older war games. Would like to see something new.
-
5 RepliesWWII, imagine the badassery with Frostbite and modern graphics at Kursk, Stalingrad, Berlin, the Bulge, Normandy, Midway, El Alamein, Anzio and a lot more. Just imagine the rush in this game. The Germans performing a Blitzkrieg, or the invasion at Normandy and you have to stop them. A new game mode revolving about the Battle of Britain. So much possibility
-
Edited by Crucifix: 2/21/2016 1:53:09 AMThe one reason I really don't like a Vietnam setting either is because the U.S did more bad than good in that war and the soldiers weren't even seen as heros after the wars end. Im honestly not sure if I'd really want to play a game like that. to me it would be the same as playing as an American soldier fighting Indians or If I played as Vietcong, it would be like playing as Al queada
-
3 RepliesVietnam
-
I would love for dice to go back to ww2, this time with a new frostbite engine, so we can see what we got used to all over again in its full destructive glory
-
1 ReplyWhy no cold war era games? Bo1 was a mastapeace
-
2 RepliesEdited by Cleric Blake: 2/21/2016 12:09:39 AMI think DICE could do a futuristic battlefield really well. I think it would be really interesting.
-
6 RepliesBad company 3 or nothing! Would love to see a very futuristic (2100s option) or WW2 battlefield tho.
-
1 Reply2020's would be cool, not too crazy but cooler gadgets and stuff.
-
1 ReplyI won't buy it if it's futuristic. I don't care if it's a sequel to 2142. I'm sick of those games.
