{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
4/6/2013 7:12:27 PM
4
Unfortunately, much "gun control" proposals as of late, include things such as restricting magazine size, banning guns with collapsible stocks, pistol grips, and other minor things. this accomplishes nothing and only serves to piss off and annoy gun owners, by inhibiting the use of their guns. I agree with things like background checks, and things of that nature before being able to get a gun, but alot of what's been going around lately, is either "hur dur, ban guns with this or this attached, durrr" or rawrrrrr ban all guns blarrr!"
English
-
If Adam Lanza had to reload more during the shooting, he would have fired less bullets, and less people would have died. You just can't argue with that. Even Megyn Kelly from FOX News understands this.
-
and what is your response to the fact that the difference between 10 and 30 round magazines is 0.3 seconds? 3/10s of a second.
-
Ha! Wasn't this statement proven false via demonstration by both gun owners and pro shooters who know what they are doing on targets? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hACUyD2-WC8 This is a slow reload and yet still quick enough that a victim could not get far. Reloading a fire arm isn't rocket science.
-
reloading didn't do much to stop the Virginia tech shooter now did it? He killed more than Lanza with smaller weapons and smaller clips.
