{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by AllanChester:
9/27/2016 9:59:14 AM
7
Who would really win?
They've gone through the normal training for the three groups. Who would win?
[spoiler]The templars would be equipped with a steel great sword and a shield[/spoiler]
[spoiler]vikings have a battle ax[/spoiler]
[spoiler]and samurais are equipped with an Yuchi katana[/spoiler]
English
#Offtopic
-
Knight durh
-
Edited by Relyks: 9/27/2016 4:51:11 PMOk. Samurai, as much as I love them the most, will definitely lose. Their armor is not made of metal, and their swords are thin. This is because their fighting style is geared to mobility and a stabbing and slashing movement which will not pierce metal armor as well, whereas Knights and Vikings are more of a clubbing and heaving motion. And this is not bad, because at that time, that's the only thing that they really needed to fight wars. Either the Samurai would win over the Viking since Vikings don't have as much armor as the Knight would, as it is highly unlikely katanas can pierce knight armor. But in the end, it would come to the Knight.
-
Samurai. [spoiler][b][i]Just seems the most formidable. Idk why. [/i][/b][/spoiler]
-
A great sword and shield would be impossible to hold or at least swing maybe a regular sword but a great sword I may be thinking of something else
-
The templar because he's wearing full armour and this is a 1v1v1. If it were armies and they were allowed to employ their own tactics and the like, my money would be on Vikings.
-
2 RepliesIt depends very highly on the situation.
-
Viking beats Templar beats samurai beats viking?
