{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/22/2016 1:55:29 PM
6
Inferno is surprisingly depressing
I started to play Crucible again, as I wanted to practice for the next Monthly Iron Banner.
But what annoys me is Inferno. The idea is nice and simple; Normal Crucible, but with no Radars.
I thought it would be a success, but I feel it turned into a failure.
This weeks Inferno is 6v6, which is stupid.
Clash is horrible for Inferno; crouching shotgunners ready to wear your arse as a hat, snipers ready to grab your special ammo.
I'm basically stating Inferno is horrible for 6v6, and on larger maps, its pure snipe to win.
And on smaller maps, its then shotgun to win.
And then Control is terrible for Inferno, snipers just sit there and camp, watching the Objectives.
What is the point of Inferno Control if you can only get points from killing?
-
They don't have radar. That means you can actually flank them.
-
3 RepliesInferno Clash is fine, but Inferno Control is kind of pointless. If the enemy can see that you are capturing a zone, it defeats the purpose of not having a radar.
-
Destiny turns into cod with inferno. Corner camping and hard scoping.
-
Love inferno.prop my most fun activity to do.
-
Seriously! I love inferno! At first I hated it, but I played a few more games in a row and I noticed I'm not fixated on the radar all the time, I'm just playing and I'm actually a bit more chill. I prefer control because I like objectives. Clash is ok, but I still have fun with either.
-
7 RepliesHad the exact opposite match last night. Everyone running around blasting each other. Think I saw 1 sniper. I ran around shotgunning and using Soul Stealer and it was fun. I think it just happened to be a bad match for you.
