But at the same time, that means women have to once again compromise for men. See the issue?

I think so. It's a historical and modern issue that a lot of people, especially male, don't see. Women, very often, have to compromise for men when men don't have to. That's not to say that men don't compromise in some regards, in fact, there are instances where only men compromise. That being said, women are forced to compromise much more often. Feminism was found by women, for women. Only more recently has it come to encompass other people. Still, to say that all of that work done by women should be set aside so that the name can be changed to something that makes men feel less insecure is a slight against the movement. It's about equality/equity. In the modern world, that's a statement. It shouldn't matter what the name is. Women being in a place of power (in moderation to the rest of the world) is not a bad thing. I am male. Feminism, the movement and the name, shouldn't change because other males want it to be more in their favour if that means we take focus off women and their subjugation. Men are a part of feminism now but still have much else in their favour. For the most part, women just have feminism. Some might counter this point by saying there is next to no movements for men. Well, that's because men have never needed them in a general scale. Where men do need it, feminism takes the mantle to make sure things stay even, such as so that women aren't guaranteed custody when they don't deserve it, for example. TL;DR: Changing the name to make men more comfortable defies the movement.