{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
4/6/2015 3:32:23 PM
5
Mathhew and mark got there at almost the same time, john got there at a different time. And luke doesnt describe alot, he just says that she went in then out because he was told to just write that. There are many reasons why some thing is mentioned in one book and not the other.
English
-
That's not true at all. The gospels were written 30 to 70 years after Jesus. None of them were at the tomb so you might wanna think of a different answer
-
Thats not true, who do you think wrote the gospels? They were all written by the people with the names. Also, to fix my statement. Matthew and mark never went to the tomb they only hear what others told them jojn went to the tomb and luke didnt he heard it through mary. That is why there are different accounts. Matthew and mark are just mentioning the one that talked, they were more about the speaking and john was giving more visual to it. Luke was just telling of the miracle of the ressurection
-
So they weren't there like I said
-
How do journalists write stories as fact when never having been at the place they are writing about? Or having gone through the experience that they are being told happened by someone else?
-
It's all written through oral tradition. I'm not saying this, I did research on the Bible and found that out. Mark's gospel was written first about 30 years after and John being the last about 60 years after
