{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Slaynite:
2/18/2015 2:51:14 PM
195
Imagine if Blizzard or Bethesda had made Destiny OR collaborated with Bungie.
I have to think that the finished product would have been unbelievable.
We should've seen this lackluster performance coming from Bungie, they have an amazing concept and player functionality, and seemingly have no clue how to harness it...but..
Bungie also [b]murdered[/b] Halo with Halo:Reach. So I knew that should've tempered my expectations, but I wanted to believe.
The utter lack of content in Destiny should be enough for us to believe another company would've better complimented this awesome concept.
[b]EDIT: I'm not saying I hate bungie, I'm just saying the game hasn't realized its potential even if it's just the first installment.
I like the idea of a 3 team collaboration with Bungie handling the fps aspect, blizzard on the class system and Bethesda on the story[/b].
English
#Destiny
-
Reach was my favorite halo game :(
-
Blizzard is the problem.
-
You know Activision is part of blizzard right?
-
Again it's not bungie, it's Activisions fault. Bungie made the deal with the idiots, idiots change the game to something simple for idiots to understand.
-
2 RepliesBethesda Bethasda Bethasda Bethesda BETHESDA BETHESDA ES6 I LOVE YOU SKYRIM WAS GREAT NOW TAKE ME TO NEW ADVENTURES!!!
-
Hey, I liked Reach the best. And to be honest it wasn't entirely bungies fault that many don't like Reach. Microsoft forced bungie to collaborate with 343 so they could pass the torch over time. If it was full on bungie, it may have been a different game
-
On July 25, 2013, Activision Blizzard announced the purchase of 429 million shares from owner Vivendi, valuing US$2.34 billion. As a result, Activision Blizzard became an independent company I am sure you all probably know this too. May 21st 2012, a judge in the Los Angeles Superior Court ordered that Bungie's contract with Activision, previously sealed during discovery in the Activision v. West and Zampanella case, be unsealed. The contract (full contract) was published in its entirety by the LA Times, and provided a number of pieces of information that were previously unknown and/or only speculated: "Destiny" is the operating title for Bungie's next project. Destiny will consist of a series of four MMO-style "sci-fantasy action shooter" titles, released every other year beginning in Fall 2013. Expansion pack-style downloadable content (DLC), code named "Comet," will be released every other year beginning in 2014. Destiny will feature a number of DLCs, microtransactions, and value-added paid services. Destiny is targeting a "Teen" rating from the ESRB in the United States and a PEGI16 rating in Europe. Activision, as previously confirmed, retains the exclusive right to publish all Destiny titles. However, Bungie retains ownership of the Destiny intellectual property regardless of its relationship with Activision. Bungie will receive $2.5 million per year from 2010 through 2013 to develop Destiny. Bungie will receive between 20 and 35% of cumulative operating income for Destiny, depending on the total amount of income. Bungie is eligible for a number of performance and sales-based bonuses depending on Destiny meeting certain development milestones and sales goals.
-
Blizzard -- never would have played Bethesda -- should be working on TES VI Interesting thought though.
-
6 RepliesI like everything you say except how they mustered the series with Reach. I was personally a big fan.
-
4 Repliesyeah your idea sounds like you want to add more chiefs when you really just need more indians
-
Edited by Terminix: 2/18/2015 6:16:06 PMIf destiny was made by Bethesda you wouldn't be able to virtually walk 5 ft without something glitching out.
-
3 RepliesLol Bethesda, after ESO and Skyrim?
-
2 RepliesOr what if Bioware had some input?
-
I bring this up all the time bro. Respect and salutes to you
-
6 RepliesThey murded halo with reach? Really?!? Wow.., well.., i dont remember any other halo with space battles...
-
If only they had made it. Then you'd probably have to pay a $20 a month subscription fee just to play, $20 for each expansion and their social areas would be packed with people trying to sell or trade exotics and you'd have to mute your tv because all you can hear is a thousand people yelling over each other... Sounds like fun to me... [spoiler]Not trying to sound like a douche but it'd probably end up like this[/spoiler]
-
7 RepliesIf they had made destiny we all would still be level 5 lol. It takes forever to level in WOW, but partly due to the massive areas to explore :)
-
[quote][b]I like the idea of a 3 team collaboration with Bungie handling the fps aspect, blizzard on the class system and Bethesda on the story[/b].[/quote]This would have made Destiny the game that they advertised...
-
2 Replies[b][i]If Destiny was made by Bethesda...[/i][/b] Destiny would be single-player, extremely open-world and modular. Guardians would all be modded to look like balloon-breasted anime girls with skimpy bikini armor. [b][i]If Destiny was made by Blizzard...[/i][/b] Loot could be traded for real money, class balance would be horrible and you would need to pay a $15 monthly subcription fee.
-
1 ReplyIf blizzard helped with destiny.. I would be speechless. Coming from a WoW player, there would be SO MUCH MORE than there is now.
-
You're taking issue with Bungie when you should be annoyed with activision.
-
Your edit makes me drool...
-
It would have sucked. They don't know how to make FPSs.
-
If they just had a few people from Blizzard we might actually have some good quests and new bounties every couple months.
-
3 RepliesEdited by Folk: 2/17/2015 8:42:23 AM[quote]Bethesda on the story.[/quote] >Bethesda >Story Pick one
-
3 RepliesImagine if you didn't post this worthless thread...
