How does that make any sense? Adept should cost the adept, and normal rolls should cost normal engrams. Makes zero sense for it to cost both for a normal roll.
-
6 RepliesEdited by eliteg: 5/12/2025 5:37:23 PM
eliteg👍🦾🟠🛕 - 4/14/2026 12:48:00 AM
I agree with you OP. Its not the right deal to entice some of us who have never - and will never do a GM.. so we wait for XUR to offer NF ciphers or featured means nothing to us. Now if they made NF ciphers have a random chance in other NF than I would consider doing more regular NFs... but as it stands 5 engrams or 1 nf cipher and 1 engram... just doesn't move me at all... thats a lot of engaging in an activity you don't find fun.. 5 engrams... geezus that reward director/pm sure knows how to cook > [spoiler]💩💩💩💩💩[/spoiler] Luckily at least they are dropping 2 weapons (always a cruel mercy in addition to featured NF weapon) so that makes it more interesting once they fix the no masterwork on the cruel mercy.... -
To save you some engrams
-
than don't use them? the option to use cypers is for use less engrams
-
2 RepliesIt's literally a better economy. 1 GM NF=2 Ciphers Double Rewards=4 You aren't leveling your Vanguard faster than this.
-
5 RepliesThe normal cost to focus a non adept weapon normaly is 5 engrams so the option to focus one for 1 engram and 1 chipher is more of a offer