Alright, I've heard this argument over and over again, from countless people over the past year. The classic "It isn't OP because it hasn't been changed" argument. I'll give you this chance now to figure out why it's flawed before I begin. Done? Still think it's the right mindset? Well let's get down to business then. The idea that something can't be Overpowered because it hasn't been altered is silly. Look at Blade last year. Up until September, it reigned supreme in the Crucible with nothing else even coming close. And it was OP. But, it hadn't been changed since launch? How can this be OP then by your thinking? I mean, it only basically guaranteed you 3-5 kills per activation with a stellar neutral game. And yet, it took a year for Bungie to change anything about it. So, was it OP? By your same logic, it could not have been. And yet, the very same people who are saying Striker now isn't OP are the ones who cried about Blade for a year. Let that sink in for a moment. Now let's continue as to the true reason why this thinking is flawed. If everything else gets nerfed, and another thing keeps all of its original lethality, even if it wasn't OP before, it becomes OP by comparison. Let's take Pulse Rifles for example. They had one major change in November 2014, and that was it for about a year. However, they were overshadowed by the reign of Hand Cannons until September '15. Those Hand Cannons get nerfed, and within a week it's complaints about Pulse Rifles. But, 2.0 had largely glossed over them. What happened to make everyone think they were OP? Simple, the nerf to Hand Cannons, being a counter to Pulse Rifles, made them not have a contender. And, by comparison to the other primaries, they were now OP. We saw this recently with the Mida as some people claimed it to be OP, despite it, until the April Update, never receiving a single change. Why? Because it out-performed most other primaries in the game by a wide enough margin that people took note. We even see this now with the Doctrine of Passing archetype of Auto Rifle. Sure, it's had to nerfs recently, but until then that archetype had been untouched since the original Auto Rifle nerf. And hell, they were considered wholly [u]underpowered[/u] by a significant portion of the community until just around the time Pulse Rifles were nerfed. Let that sink in for a moment. An archetype, considered to be one of the weakest in the game, make a MASSIVE jump to being the number one target of people's complaints, despite very little of it being changed until recently from the original nerf. So no. Just because something has been untouched, does not mean it will be the same balanced ability/gun it was when all the competition gets nerfed. That whole line of thinking is just backwards.