{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/24/2015 8:10:08 PM
1
Hmm. The piece of paper on my office wall with my name above "Doctorate of Philosophy in Biology" is worth [i]a lot[/i] of money. Probably worth more than your questionable insight into online personas. Just a [i]lil bit.[/i]
English
-
Yet you know knowing of psychology, not sociology as you stated. Lucky for me I studied them both.
-
Uh oh. You walked right into this one: I'm formally trained as a behavioral ecologist, so I am steeped in game theory and evolutionary psychology. Autonomously taught Psychology 403 (Animal Behavior) in graduate school. As a professor, I teach Animal Cognition, Behavioral Ecology, Evolution (among several other courses not germane to this conversation), and a seminar on Evolutionary Psychology. You lose this one, pal. Your choice how you want to proceed.
-
Edited by Morgana Nimueh: 6/24/2015 10:07:41 PMLost what? When a person changes a subject to deflect what the original subject was about means they conceded defeat. You lose. Have a nice day.
-
That's priceless. I'm assuming that's your coward's way out. If not, man-up and [i]explain[/i] what I deflected. If I did, it wasn't my intention at all. So, help me understand what I didn't answer to your satisfaction, so that I can address your concerns. I'll wait...
-
People who deflect from the original debate have realised they have lost. so change the subject to appear more in control. You are trying to appear more superior by using your qualifications to win this argument. For someone who considers themselves an expert on psychology you actually appear to know nothing about it.
-
Wow. You're incapable of admitting when you're outmatched, aren't you. You can't just say I'm deflecting, but not tell me [i]what exactly[/i] I'm deflecting. That slightly upset feeling you have, that's from me kicking your pathetic ass across this exchange. Redeem yourself, or not, I don't care. The challenge follows (again, because you failed it the first time): Where, specifically, did I deflect a question you asked me? If I did, it was unintentional. Give me the chance to address your claim that I am deflecting. Reread our back-n-forth and [i]show me[/i] where I wasn't responding directly to something you wrote. Waiting...
-
Edited by Morgana Nimueh: 6/25/2015 8:37:11 AMI'm not the only one who is incapable of admitting they are out matched. You claim to know about psychology, I given you examples yet you don't recognize the basics. I'm also the only one who is completely calm at this moment indicating I'm not under pressure to prove oneself. You are.
-
I think we're done here. You have nothing more to contribute. I've asked you several times to show exactly [i]where[/i] I have deflected, and you refuse. Why? If you respond with anything other than showing me specifically where I either, 1. Deflected to avoid addressing the issue, or 2. Failed to identify these important psychology basics you think you so astutely introduced, then you prove only your immaturity and lack of education. I'll wait, though the mature thing for you to do would be to not respond at all.
