You're doing a lot of raging and not much legitimate debating. Post an intellectual response instead of drivel if you want to actually prove a point
English
-
My point is absolutely legitimate. You're trying to compare 1 person to an entire company employing over 500 people and say the outcome difference makes sense. My point is, given the same resources and funding (which, Google it, the 500 Mill wasn't for marketing mostly) I could certainly build a better game. Now, I suppose your point being that I'm not going to get all those resources, which is a valid point, but you're flawed comparison doesn't fly. oh, why don't you (1 person) do a better job than them (over 500 people). Apples and Potatoes man.
-
It's not apples to oranges. It's one Apple to a bunch of apples. Instead of pointing out facts and legitimate coding flaws, you're just insulting the devs. It's one thing to say someone didn't do their job factually and another to insult which is an opinion. You implied you could do better by blindly bashing instead of just stating problems and solutions. If you think you can do better than do it. If you can't do it without help then you can't expect someone else to do the same after indirectly comparing yourself to the team (bungie) as a whole. You're also not acknowledging how dev teams CANT constantly work hand in hand and coding redundancies will happen, especially when dealing with large scale management that comes from the kind of investment involved here. So your two options are to do better on your own or to do it with the same resources, in which case, you'd encounter the same problems that result in not having control over every aspect of the process, which you wouldn't at that scale.