{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Modificato da Centurion:
8/14/2017 9:21:37 PM
29
Are you a social liberl, a leftist (Cultural Marxist), Classical liberal, or a social conservative.
If you are economic and social Marxist, why do you want to limit general freedom such as forcing people to do things by the state.
If a social conservative, why prevent people from doing what they want socially?
If a social liberal, why do you think it is right to keep pushing to the left or limit constitution rights?
If a classical liberal, why be a classical liberal when in history there may be times to slightly regulate the market from monopolies? Would you have slight regulations but try to keep individual liberty maximized?
Please explain
-
3 RisposteI'm a conflict theorist.
-
um socially awkward
-
2 Risposte-blam!- liberals
-
I'm an alt alt alt alt alt alt alt alt alt alt alt ... [ your choice ]
-
1 RispondiNo option for Centrist?
-
1 RispondiClassic Conservative?
-
1 RispondiI'm an American citizen and veteran. I believe in hard work equality and freedom. Label that whatever you want.
-
44 Risposte[quote]If a social liberal, why do you think it is right to keep pushing to the left or limit constitution rights?[/quote]This doesn't make sense. What constitutional rights are being limited by social liberalism?
-
5 RisposteŃáźí Option?
-
Fun fact, tolkien was an anarchist
-
Modificato da Armani: 8/15/2017 10:01:44 PMNone of them, I'm a true National Socialist. Before I get a bunch of hatemail, no [b]I do not hate anyone[/b], no I have no affiliation with the KKK or skinheads - these are not even legitimate national socialists, they are thugs who have hijacked National Socialism. Hatred itself is not part of what National Socialism is about. If you want to know what National Socialism really is about, you must educate yourself because it's been so slandered and smeared by everyone and their mother since WWII. You will almost never get an honest or accurate response if you consult your textbooks or teachers I can promise you that. Understanding perspectives is crucial, and a perspective such as National Socialism is so greatly misrepresented and in need of understanding. God bless you all, and my sincerest of wishes!
-
National Socialists?
-
Modificato da Crackerjack: 8/15/2017 9:06:32 PMThe most accurate term I can think of is is a Constitutionalist. Please note that this doesn't mean I hold the platforms of the Constitution Party of America.
-
5 RisposteE none of the above
-
1 RispondiWhat about centrists? We are the truly enlightened. Lean left or right. As long as you are balanced and not radical alt left or radical alt right. Far end of both sides of the spectrum are ignorant ideologies. You can be left or right without leaning into ignorance. https://www.bungie.net/en/Forum/Post/230031899/0/0 relevant. [spoiler]seriously it actually is.[/spoiler]
-
[quote]If you are economic and social Marxist, why do you want to limit general freedom such as forcing people to do things by the state. If a social conservative, why prevent people from doing what they want socially? If a social liberal, why do you think it is right to keep pushing to the left or limit constitution rights? If a classical liberal, why be a classical liberal when in history there may be times to slightly regulate the market from monopolies? Would you have slight regulations but try to keep individual liberty maximized? Please explain[/quote] Libertarian AnCap
-
Going off the options, social liberal
-
2 RisposteI dunno. I vote for tony abbot so whats that make me?
-
3 RisposteWhat if I'm a moderate? Or is this wrong list for that?
-
Modificato da Stallcall: 8/15/2017 7:06:10 AMMarket Anarchist. The closest option you have is classical liberal. [quote]If a classical liberal, why be a classical liberal when in history there may be times to slightly regulate the market from monopolies? Would you have slight regulations but try to keep individual liberty maximized?[/quote] It would be naive to say that monopolies absolutely [i]couldn't [/i] form in an [i]actual[/i] free market. In theory, it could happen. However, state power is absolutely not the remedy, especially when we consider that 1) the state itself is a monopoly, and 2) the state's efforts to regulate have been the single largest contributor to regulatory capture and to the contribution of oligarchic markets. Too often people point to the past when they attempt to come up with examples for monopolies that we need to be protected from, but they ignore the fact that these monopolies rise out of markets "dirtied" by the state's touch. Second, it is equally naive to say that we are better off without regulation. I personally want regulation for products that I consume. That said, let's not fall victim to the assumption that regulation [i]must[/i] come from a public monopoly - the state. Not only are the state's regulatory agencies notoriously corrupt and hilariously detached from consumers, but they also smother innovation while remaining ineffective.
-
18 RispostePeople should see how taxation work before acusticly screaming "TaxAtIOn Is ThEFt"
-
I simply don't give a -blam!-.
-
I'm god.
-
1 RispondiAnarchy because either way I'm wrong and -blam!- it none of that stuff seems to work anyway.
-
3 RisposteOf the options you present, I'm probably closest to social liberal. I'm not in favour of pushing to the left or limiting constitutional rights like you say though. On issues like freedom of speech and individual rights I lean more towards absolutist stances than most social liberals.
-
1 RispondiI honestly don't have a clue what I am. I agree with some things "the left" says, and I agree with some things "the right" says. In any case I don't really feel the need to put a label on myself. I know what I think and that's all that matters to me. [spoiler]I know this isn't really what your post was about but eh, w/e.[/spoiler]
