{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
3/23/2016 8:10:52 PM
24
What should the next Battlefield be?
The sequel to my CoD thread from a while ago.
The leak about it being set in WW1 is exciting because it could work with a little effort. And think of how unique that'd be! It's never really been done before, outside of indie game Verdun. Also, the opportunities for a heartfelt story mode are there, perhaps letting BF finally get out of the story mode slump it's been in since the much maligned BF3 story mode (ECH)
Orrrrrr they could just do the same thing they did in BF3 and 4 with shinier graphics and shootier guns...whatever...
English
#Gaming
-
4 RisposteNot WW1 since most of the war took place in trenches
-
All you guys talking about scifi settings...yet nobody likes it when CoD does it. Sounds contrived to me.
-
-
2 RisposteModificato da StiviX: 3/25/2016 12:25:17 AM2143 is the only correct option. Why 2142 never got a sequel still bewilders me.
-
1 RispondiBad Co 3 Battlefield 1944 (Lots of interesting things could come from a game set in 1944) 2143
-
Biased poll is biased
-
Battlefield 5
-
While i would love WW1, id hate the pacing, sitting in trenches all day. Maybe desert storm era?
-
5 RisposteI'll take option number 3: Battlefield 2143
-
7 RisposteModificato da ShapelessHorr0r: 3/24/2016 12:19:08 PMWW1 and WW2 settings would never sell for 60$. Get over it. [b][i][u]2143[/u][/i][/b]
-
4 Rispostedoes anyone realize that ww1 is one of the most boring wars?? trench warfare is so lame sounding
-
1 RispondiDoesn't matter to me. As long as it's not a futuristic one like CODs been doing
-
1 RispondiMy favorite part of BF is the variety of class/weapon customization. So if it's a ww1/ww2 game I probably won't have much interest in it.
-
1 RispondiThe problem with going to WW2 is a huge setback in gear. Another Vietnam BF game would be cool. But any route it takes I probably will still buy it.
-
3 RisposteWW2 would make more sense than WW1.
-
4 RisposteNeither. I want to go in the future.
-
Long as it isn't a dumbed down spin-off like Bad Company or Hardline.
-
Modificato da KingsmanLXIX: 3/23/2016 11:16:37 PMI reckon the devs should wait until the end of the American elections , then they could probably do Battlefield: American Civil War.
-
1 RispondiNeither of these. We want Bad Company 3!!!
-
1 RispondiJust wait for battalion to come out
-
1 RispondiI'd pick Bad Company 3. Also, biased poll is biased.
-
The psychometric value of this question is horrible. I prefer option 1, but the question is heavily biased toward one over the other.?
-
6 RisposteWw1 would be so boring...
-
1 RispondiI've always liked shootier guns
