{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Modificato da Ghost J34:
10/14/2015 7:03:47 PM
1
[quote]2. So how exactly do I need to improve my reading comprehension? I said you should apologize, and you quote yourself not apologizing?[/quote]
The fact that you think this is about apologizing is exactly why you need to improve your reading comprehension. I recommend their beginner's package, it should work wonders for you.
[quote]You overreacted.[/quote]
[quote]Edit #2: Even if it ends being being an [b]over-reaction:[/b][/quote]
[quote]You overreacted to the extent that you had to delete your original post.[/quote]
I haven't deleted anything, are you retarded? Don't worry, rhetorical question. I already know the answer.
[quote]I am sure you have some more wonderful insights to share with the world.[/quote]
We all know you don't, that's for sure.
English
-
[quote]The fact that you think this is about apologizing is exactly why you need to improve your reading comprehension. I recommend their beginner's package, it should work wonders for you. [/quote] Hmmm... [i]I wonder why I could have gotten that impression?[/i] I don't know... Oh, that right. [u]You responded to my post saying that you should apologize[/u]. Lets go over that again. Me: [quote]I believe what you meant to say was "my bad, I totally overreacted. Sorry about that."[/quote] You: [quote][quote]Edit #2: Even if it ends being being an over-reaction: 1. It doesn't hurt to let Bungie know exactly where the community stands and the backlash they'll receive if they do something as stupid as this. 2. It says something about Bungie's/Activision's reputation that people would so easily suspect them of doing this. [/quote] I found something that can help with your obvious reading comprehension issues: https://www.hookedonphonics.com [/quote] [b]So why would I think this is about apologizing? Maybe because you were responding to my post discussing your non-existent apology.[/b] I JUMPED TO THE CONCLUSION that your response to my post was in some way related to my post, not just random ramblings. I apologize. In the future, I won't assume that, when you respond to a post, your post is actually in response to that post. [quote]I haven't deleted anything, are you retarded? Don't worry, rhetorical question. I already know the answer.[/quote] Again, apologies. I assumed that your original post was deleted. I probably should have read the transition between EDIT 3 on the top into the original post a little closer. Most of the time people notate where the original post starts if they put the edit on top.
-
Modificato da Ghost J34: 10/14/2015 10:31:45 PMAgain, you're an idiot. You told me to apologize for over-reacting even though I already had an "over-reaction" clause written into the post long before your retarded self popped into my thread. That is the point that has gone so far above your head that you couldn't even feel the breeze as it flew by. But after you admitted to not being able to read thoroughly, I can hardly say I'm surprised.
-
1. I admitted I didn't read thoroughly, not that I couldn't. There is a difference. 2. You didn't apologize for overreacting. I understand that you think you didn't overreact, even though it turns out you were completely wrong. Which is overreacting. But either way, it's been an enlightening conversation. Best of luck to you in the future. Someday I hope you learn to be able to turn some of your critical eye on your own behavior.
