-
Bungie.
-
1 RispondiThe Chinese military is massive, and difficult to maintain. The US has been at war well over a decade right now.
-
Australia. [spoiler]Ha![/spoiler]
-
1 RispondiBut the Chinese hate their government...
-
6 RisposteI am American(even ex-military), but I would have to say China. Everyone can shove their patriotism for a second and objectively look at facts. Assuming neutral battleground: -China has nukes like the U.S. so we can say that both sides would agree not to use as this would screw not only the 2 involved countries but the rest of the world as well (the economic windfall would be devestating). -Now we come to military force. China equals the U.S. in the air and sea. So if we do a 1/1 removal of air force and navy, we are left with troops. -China far outweighs the U.S. in population and they're a communist country which can, and would, force every citizen into the military. So a 1/1 removal of ground troops mathematically leaves... -China as the winner.
-
2 RisposteAmerica has this https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=O5GjlJYJF90
-
-
No one. Not the US, not China, and not the rest of the world. Let alone the complex web of allies and enemies of each that could get pulled in, that war would hamstring two of the largest, most international economies in the world. Things would suck for tons of people who weren't even involved.
-
9 RisposteModificato da Molag Bal: 11/19/2014 6:48:55 PM1.3 billion Chinese vs 317 white people Odds aren't looking good but don't worry! The U.S. has India on its side!
-
Here. This might help. [spoiler]And I'm going to go with the U.S.[/spoiler]
-
Lmao I'd like to see a country invade the U.S. when a large amount of its citizens either own or have extremely easy access to guns.
-
-
2 RisposteUS millitary is much mire advanced than any other nation in the world. We would win by that alone.
-
4 Risposte“The citizen speaks of opportunity, the bureaucrat speaks of authority, and the diplomat speaks of policy. The soldier does not speak, the soldier acts, and that is why it is the soldier who wins the war.”
-
China would probably win but would basically self destruct due to excessive amount of pollution they are giving off and overturn of government from the citizens
-
Modificato da Der Todesengel: 11/20/2014 3:43:35 PMNo one. [url=http://www.globalfirepower.com/]That said.....[/url] - Der
-
China. We've been miltarizing them like we did to Germany before WW2. War is never about spreading democracy.... All about the almighty dollar. http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TC3tINgWfQE I invite you to watch that video. I honestly hope WW3 doesn't happen.
-
-
6 RisposteModificato da KiTTYReCkless: 11/19/2014 8:22:25 PMNo one would win. Next world war will likely be fought with nukes. So doubt it will happen. Not to mention China needs us so we can buy all their cheap shit. We need China for that cheap shit and loans.
-
6 Risposte
-
3 Risposte
-
6 RisposteThe US. It wouldn't even be a close fight.
-
2 RisposteUS wins hands down, but it takes a long time for all the bodies to hit the floor. [spoiler]But in all honesty hopefully we will never find out. #NOWW3[/spoiler]
-
2 RisposteYeah Russia would win they have more nukes. But US would win if not Russia!
-
-
Lenny. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)