{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/22/2017 6:49:26 PM
5
I honestly expected them to introduce bigger teams, bigger maps, and an overall bigger experience. I want 12v12, 32v32, 64v64 combat, not 4v4. This seems like a HUGE step in the wrong direction. At the least, I want to be able to play with my full 6 man raid team. 4v4 Iron Banner???? LAME. Underwhelming. Not at all what I was expecting from this game that we have all been waiting so long for.
English
-
I honestly love the idea, and have it be mayhem..... BUT, Bungie can't deal with 6v6 or trials lag, imagine 64v64 😂😞
-
Yuuup. If mag could do 256 player on ps3, I dunno what the problem is. There were guys sitting having LAN parties in the 90s with bigger battles, and people are looking at 4v4 as an improvement?
-
MAG was the shit!!! How online fun and comms should be done!
-
Ooor, we could have 4v4 in 2017? Progress!
-
The P2P on-line system Bungie has decided to go with instead of dedicated servers is why you will never see this come to fruition. The P2P system is obsolete.
