Because, like Muslims, we should keep an eye on them to avoid any future terrorist attacks.
[spoiler]In case this goes over your head, there's a growing push to have a database of Muslims because some people think all Muslims are terrorists.[/spoiler]
-
7 RisposteNot all terrorists are Muslims, but all Muslims are terrorists
-
1 RispondiOr how about this why don't we wake up and realize that every demographic has a tiny section of bad people it. There will always be bad people in the world know matter what. We can try everything from the humane to the inhumane to get rid of the bad people but we will not get the perfect peaceful world we desire.
-
20 RisposteSorry but Christians don't go around yelling Jesus when killing. Meanwhile when a Muslim shoots up a place all you hear is Allah Akbar.
-
1 Rispondi"-blam!- Christians! They're all a part of the KKK and other hate groups and just kill for no reason!" - reversed what people say about Muslims.
-
6 RisposteModificato da Wingrider07: 12/4/2015 3:59:42 AMI'm a Christian, and I don't kill abortionists. I pray that God will change their heart. Many who claim to be Christians, are not Christians.
-
4 RisposteGod, there's just so much retard present in this post. Here 12 year old. Let me explain. [spoiler]we should register Muslims because Islam is a religion of violence. Christianity is not. The number of terrorist attacks by Muslims to terrorist attacks by Christians is about 100/1. Google it. [/spoiler]
-
1 RispondiHitler had a registry of Jews... look what happened.
-
Your reasoning is based on nothing more than a hasty generalization.
-
4 RisposteThe controlling interests are pleased you continue to label and segregate yourselves. Profits have never been higher.
-
4 RisposteDuring Hurricane Katrina, people trying to escape the area were turned away by armed police at the county line because someone looted a store in the next county and didn't want any more potential looters coming over, innocent Americans died because they couldn't cross the county line and the whole country was shocked back when they heard about it, why is it any different now that these people are Muslims? Judge someone by [u]their own[/u] actions and not those of someone else.
-
15 RisposteI don't get it. He was a delusional person who identifies as a female. More like should we have transgender registry. Also, it wasn't a Planned Parenthood shooting
-
1 RispondiI'm not gonna be serious with this reply. Am I upset he killed people from a company that sells baby body parts on the black market? I doubt any of the employees at the abortion clinic have anything to do with the selling of the dead bebbies. It was the wrong thing to do. But his motives were his own
-
white men not allowed inside public buildings till we get this all sorted out
-
14 RisposteMore Americans kill innocents than Muslims ever have yet nobody is asking for an American citizen registry. People need to get a grip.
-
I don't support abortion, but I wouldn't infringe on people's rights to do it. However.... how are people seriously trying to JUSTIFY this?
-
ITT: The point is still going miles above people's heads. Also there are still idiots trying to claim that he was transgender because of a f*cking typo on his voting registry. Look it up.
-
You could call this....1984
-
Isn't it time for your afternoon nap?
-
2 RisposteNow you're just trying to b8. Mad Max, I've almost never agreed with your posts since I first saw them, but at least they were more thought out than this shit of a post. Please try harder next time.
-
10 Risposteabortion is murder plain and simple
-
-
1 Rispondi
-
Modificato da ClusiveC: 12/4/2015 6:18:56 AMI don't think so. This type of reasoning is problematic. It seems logically incoherent to me. EDIT: In fact, I'm pretty sure it is. I already posted this in another thread, but I'll basically do it here to represent why I think it is faulty: Suppose the president (or prime minister or w.e the hell he is) of Latvia came to his parliament or w.e one day and said, "After the Planned Parenthood shooting, should we have an American registry?" The problem is multiple-fold. I'll only list out 1 because I think it is sufficient. This type of reasoning is assuming that the shooter's motivations are directly linked to his religious beliefs. That may be the case, but it still doesn't show whether or not his religious beliefs are actually in line with his own religion. It may be the case that he is confused on Christian doctrines. If this is true, then we can't and shouldn't hold a registry for Christians because the problem is not based in the religion, but rather in the individual.
-
We should keep a database on the religious group that kills the most Muslims. [spoiler]That would be Muslims. [/spoiler]
-
12 RisposteAm I supposed to be upset that he killed murderers?
-
7 RisposteI heard the shooter worked there and was performing late term abortions.