People say Microsoft kept Bungie in line...
Edit 1: Put the Xbox exclusivity aside for this.
Edit 2: 800 replies!
English
#Destiny
-
It would be a Xbox exclusive however, which I would not like as a playstation user. Before you start asking me how I like my Hawkmoon, I don't support exclusives either.
-
2 RisposteShould of just made it for pc.
-
I honestly think they'd be better with Sony. The creativity that come out of third party developers signed on with Sony is astonishing. Sony seems to cater better to new IPs than Microsoft.
-
Probably but unfortunately Microsoft is selfish and it would've probably been Xbox only and i would've hated for playstation users to get shafted on another great game series.
-
3 RisposteNew exotic bungie special year 1 gift.
-
No. MSFT can't exactly say they've pushed 343 to astonishing heights with the hot mess of halo 4 and the face plant that was MCC
-
1 RispondiThe game would still suck either way.
-
1 RispondiMicrosoft maybe pricks but Damn it they are smart
-
1 RispondiLel Xbox fanboys thinking Bungie cares about them
-
1 RispondiI feel that people think Bungie would have been better off with anyone Else.
-
4 RisposteIt's hard to say - but I'm 99% sure that you would never see a "Red Bull Exclusive Quest" if Microsoft was the publisher.
-
1 RispondiYep, it would have been 4 times bigger in vanilla with giant overarching story missions with everything in the grim cards actually shown in game.
-
2 RisposteIf bungie kept all there staff when they split from Microsoft we would have a much different game now, and if we had that bungie minus that nasty ass of a company $$$activision$$$ it would of been a truly great game!! But there is always destiny 2 hopefully bungie is smart enough to cut the throat of activision and move on to a better world :D
-
2 Risposte__________________ | Krusty | | Krab | | Unfair | |_________________| (\__/) || (• - •) || / う __________________ | Mr. Krabs | | Is in | | There | |_________________| (\__/) || (• - •) || / う __________________ | Standing | | At the | | Concession | |_________________| (\__/) || (• - •) || / う __________________ | Plotting | | His | | Oppression | |_________________| (\__/) || (• - •) || / う
-
2 RisposteIt would have been made because 343 took over halo before bungie left
-
People say is not enough information, that very unsupported. Bungie would have just made more Halo. The fact that Microsoft restricted Bungie was a bad thing. If Bungie would have stayed with Microsoft there wouldn't have been a Destiny.
-
No because they wouldn't have made Destiny just more Halo.
-
I say no because, if Bungie were still with MS, they'd be making Halo, and Destiny wouldn't exist.
-
You would have hoped that they would have made use of the Azure servers which would have made it a lot more stable
-
most likely
-
1 RispondiIn my opinion yest it would have been better being published by microsoft. However i think that bungie should have gone the whole hog and self published they definately had enough a fanbase to have done that. The game would be in a much better condition had mr ryan been in complete charge the guy is a visionary.
-
6 RisposteBungie+Blizzard+Bethesda=the best MMO RPG FPS that would ever grace humanity.
-
1 RispondiMicrosoft would have limited creative freedom, so no, I don't think things would have been better for Bungie
-
7 RisposteWhat if it was bungie and treyarch
-
Microsoft fuk'd up letting them go. Bungie seemed to have more creative freedom with MS. Plus dedicated servers... need I say anymore.
-
3 RisposteIf an asteroid hit the earth and we all died...who cares