{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
2/15/2015 4:37:07 PM
1
-
Please make known your reasons why I'm not that bright.
-
If you have to ask that question...you obviously have no business making such stupid suggestions. But since you're having trouble thinking this through.... How is this any different with the current system now? People can quit at-will regardless. And they do. This is a total waste of bungie's time..... so yeah....you're not that bright....not one bit.
-
Yes, people will still quit, but I would not have to quit as much since I could vote against certain strike and yes, some people will vote for Valus, but I believe it will help more than it will hurt. It would also help the fact that the same strike would not come up over and over and seem like only half of the strikes are actually in the mix to play. Voting would also be welcome in the Crucible IMO.
-
It will change nothing. It's an unnecessary volume of coding that time can be spent elsewhere.... its just fluff.... It would be a different story if we had 2-3 times the strike mission's available to toy with. But there's just too few and its too easy to leave and fire up matchmaking all the same. Again.... waste-of-time.
-
I see your point.
-
Sorry to be terse....people tend to come up with things and overlook the big picture...so I apologize if I cam across a little brutish...but I'm glad you see why now.
-
That's ok. You just came up with counterpoints. Nothing wrong with discussions. I was thinking about Reach's Firefight for voting, but I remembered that it wasn't just the map.
