I mean for real everything from explosions to water just look crisper in h2A...how? I've heard they use the same engine but idk how that can be true
English
#Gaming
-
1 ReplyBecause it's a Bungie artstyle with a much better engine. 343 artstyle is eye cancer.
-
3 RepliesHalo 2A has the best cutscenes by far, at least by looks. It looks unreal for a game. The remastered voice acting/sound effects are amazing.
-
After playing Halo 2A multiplayer for the first time since Halo 5 came out...I actually prefer the Halo 5 graphics. I feel like I get a better view and can see things more clearly on my screen. Everything is a bit darker in Halo 5 and less flashy. Just my 2 cents. Don't get me wrong, halo 2A is still awesome but for some reason grenade explosions bother the shit out of me.
-
4 RepliesHalo 4 and 5 look so ugly...why
-
In game Halo 5 looks way better but cutscenes are just different. If anything, H2A's cutscenes look a little too unrealistic, not bad just unrealistic.
-
I think it's just the art style.
-
1 ReplyIt's because they run on different engines and Halo 2 is MUCH less complex from a technical standpoint, so Saber Interactive had a lot of resources at their disposal to make the visual engine look pretty.
-
Halo 2A has the best cutscenes by far, at least by looks. It looks unreal for a game. The remastered voice acting/sound effects are amazing.
-
19 RepliesH2A is the halo 4 engine. Halo 5 is a heavily modified halo 4 engine. It's so much different it's basically a new engine. Halo 2A is a different type of graphics than halo 5. Neither look better than each other, they're just different styles.