There should be a thirty minute suspension when you start the game. The only thing you can do is look at the Eververse store but you can skip it if you buy something.

What we need is people with IQs like this to shut up. Poorly thought out opinion is poor. [spoiler]since some people seem to be having trouble understanding me, OP is being sarcastic. I’m onsulting the people who aren’t[/spoiler]

-----thejoke------> People's heads

We need better English teachers.

Dear scrub lords, Stop crying because you cant abandone a match anymore because you got shot once. Either learn to stay and play or find another game and be quiet because nobody important cares. Seriously, siege has quiter penalties in every game mode, many games do. Stop making weak excuses and just stay and play out the match. If you cant do that dont join in the first place, go play a single player game.

Well I can’t speak for PvP because I don’t play but regarding strikes…..I have no problem at all with them quitting. I don’t leave myself because it’s a d($k move, especially if they’re new lights obviously having difficulty. But….I would much rather be in a fireteam where people left after completing their bounties opposed to being teamed with a sweaty speed runner.

I see what you're [i]trying[/i] to do, but c'mon dude, really, it's not working. If [i]I[/i] get a time out for quitting PvP then [i]everyone[/i] should get penalized for quitting [i]anything![/i] It's not a good look, and here's why. Leaving a PvP game type, like crucible or gambit, dooms the players who were unfortunate enough to get matched up on same team as a quitter to failure, or at least puts them at huge disadvantage. I'm not against penalties for leaving strikes. ...but... When a quitter leaves your strike, you may struggle a bit being one man down until you get a replacement, but you're not going to 'lose' the strike. In PvP, being a man down until you get a replacement allows the other team to gain a lead that you cannot recover from. As more quitters get thrown on your team, they see the score and quit. Etc. Etc. Leaving a non-match made game type like dungeons and raids doesn't have the same negative effect either. Either the guys you invited will be understanding if you need to leave and will stop playing, effectively pausing the game, and check their friends list for a replacement to resume, or it will self-regulate. If you're always bailing on your friends every single time, eventually your friends will stop inviting you to raid/ do dungeons. A 'quitter penalty' in its own right. But you already know this, right? I mean, deep down inside you know this but are just pissed off you can't bail with impunity if you don't like the map or something, right? Right? You don't reaaaally [i]want/see a need for[/i] quit penalties in game types other than gambit/crucible, do ya? You just don't want them in crucible and are trying to make an absurd comparison to make it seem like quit penalties in crucible are absurd. But... it's apples to oranges [b][i]"If I have to peel my orange in order to eat it, you should have to peel your apple to eat it!"[/i][/b] Sounds absurd! Because the nature of an apple is different than the nature of an orange. That's why it's absurd. Just as the repercussions for your fireteam when bailing on a crucible/gambit match are different than the repercussions for your fireteam when bailing in the other activities you mentioned. That's why the idea of penalties in crucible/gambit are warranted while the idea of penalties in the modes you mentioned to add penalties to is absurd. Am I right or am I right?

I just got suspended for buying the least amount of silver…

You spell like Darrell Brooks talks