{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
7/22/2018 8:26:54 PM
10
Is book of sorrows canon or folklore?
Title.
I know it could have been considered hive mythology anyway, but I took it as the hive historical record.
-
Canon
-
Canon. Oryx didn't strike me as a BSer, like Bungie....rewriting shkt to cover their F-ups.
-
It's cannon, but from an unreliable source. Even Savathûn said that they were bs and can't be trusted
-
3 RepliesCanon, it would ridiculous if they went back on it.
-
3 RepliesEdited by Archival Mind: 7/22/2018 11:26:37 PM<Canon. FFS nearly everything's still canon. People just took the folklore comment out of proportion... though I guess the comic didn't help. But I like to ignore the comics, they go against both games anyway. No amount of combining can fix that error.>
-
1 ReplyNeither. It’s BORING!
-
Canon that we know of. However, you must keep in mind that it’s all from Oryx’ perspective, granted he wouldn’t have much reason to lie about what actually happened.
-
I mean it’s couldn’t not be it’s got first hand accounts from oryx
-
Very much canon. The Books of Sorrow are literally journals from Oryx and his sisters themselves. It is a Hive historical record; I couldn't imagine it to be mythology simply because the evidence is far too concrete from what has happened in the events of Destiny 1 and now Destiny 2.
-
Cannon, they mention the books in the ps4 exclusive taken strike
