Hunters have always had the majority, even when they weren’t good in PvP. I chose the class in D1 based on visual appeal (that and most of my friends chose Warlock and Titan so I thought I’d be the Hunter). I chose Hunter in D2 because I mained Hunter in D1.

Except if you look at the skills you will se that they are weaker than titans... Titan melee can do 170 or so damage without exotic boosts on a normal charged melee attack.... Hunter melee can only do 135 dmg max and that is after a melee kill on arcstrider.. Pulse grenade does the same damage per pulse as the entire arcbolt ...and lightning grenade does almost 50% more damage... Arcstrider needs 2-3 hits on every super....except gunslinger....wich dies to a stone thrown at it... 2 of the 3 titan supers need only 1 attack to kill arcstrider. A titan wall blocks bullet/deals damage and reloads weapons.... A hunter dodge only reloads weapons ....it used to block bullets from hitting you too,but they nerfed that because of whiners... So in what way are hunters better than titans ? I am not saying nerf/buff....just a serious question....you all complain hunters are more powerfull...but every skill says otherwise....

My hunter earlier consisted of huckelberry, Manannan sr4 a d belfry bounty. Nightstalker class Frost EE5 I did well generally coming top of my team although we did lose some. So I have to disagree that you can't win unless you use Graviton. It can be done

They aren't OP people just like to master the classes cause they're harder to and it's a fun challenge

People will tend to use what’s Easiest or anything that gives them a advantage - Antiope, G Lance, V Wing, WormHusk, etc... can’t fault them for wanting the best chance at winning(not using those will sadly put you at a disadvantage) . Can’t beat, em JOIN EM You must become “That” guy-Runs arc strider, worm husk and any of the weapons listed above

Yes, We are not OP, but we are superior