[quote]While the future of the West Coast’s earthquake early warning system is in peril from President Trump’s proposed budget cuts, the network is beginning to slowly gain traction in both small and big ways.
A scattering of buildings are now equipped with audible alarms that will give occupants an advance warning ranging from seconds to more than a minute before the shaking from a major earthquake begins.
There are even buildings wired to prevent people from being trapped in elevators after an earthquake. The system is set up to trigger elevators to stop at the nearest floor for occupants to escape as an announcement is simultaneously broadcast: “Earthquake! Earthquake! Earthquake! Drop, cover and hold on!”
[...]
Yet the rapid progress could all unravel if President Trump’s budget is approved. The Department of the Interior is proposing no funding for the system this year and “would end USGS efforts to implement the ShakeAlert earthquake early warning system, suspending internal efforts and eliminating external funding to partners” such as Caltech, UC Berkeley, the University of Oregon and the University of Washington.
Seismologist Lucy Jones, who formerly worked for the USGS, said she imagines that such a decision would cripple the ShakeAlert program.
Ending federal involvement in the system would prompt scientists to leave the project, Jones said. The early warning program needs dozens of researchers continually improving the software, monitoring and operating the system, and installing and repairing seismic sensors, she said.
“We are on the cusp of it really making a difference here in Southern California,” Jones said in an interview. Without the USGS’ leadership, “it would have to start over from a very basic level.”[/quote]
What, exactly, is the benefit in cutting this? It can save tons of lives and damage to property. Does Trump want to increase the injuries, deaths, and damages done by earthquakes?
-
Get hit by a meteor already, cuck capital
-
24 RepliesFinally California will fall
-
7 RepliesIt does not matter if Trump cuts liberals earthquake sensors because apparently he is not there president
-
5 RepliesHe very well may want to cause some death and destruction in california, the cuck capital of America.
-
1 Reply[quote]I can save tons of lives and damage to property.[/quote] Damn, max, you're pretty confident in your abilities.
-
7 RepliesITT: Republicans would eat their own shit if it meant liberals had to smell their breath.
-
Edited by High Charity: 6/9/2017 3:29:16 PMLook at all the totally reasonable and peaceful conservatives saying "good" in here. Wonder what it's like on that fantasy land where you shit ice cream hoping for American deaths. Terrorists.
-
Cool, that wpuld be one less liberal state to worry about,
-
12 RepliesSounds like a win win to me.
-
9 RepliesHow come people say California sucks? I don't get it.
-
California unwilling to pay for earthquake early detection.
-
3 RepliesThe responses to this post have been disgusting and completely un-American. Yes, California is a blue state and a liberal stronghold. Yes, their collective values and opinions are different. They are still Americans. They are still our countrymen/women. You should not want to see anything bad happen to them no matter how much you disagree with them. They are part of the fabric that make up this great nation of ours and we all must learn to live together. Do not allow yourselves to be divided by the pettiness of party politics. Has this division gotten so bad that we would wish the deaths of millions of our own people to purge an ideology? How does that make us better than ISIS?
-
Shut up
-
4 RepliesCan California secede already?
-
Well it is Cali, so...
-
You do realize that states can pick up their own tab for stuff like this right?
-
2 RepliesWe didn't need California anyways
-
9 RepliesGood. Hopefully a 10.0 happens and wipes your shit state off the map
-
And what is stopping California for paying the tab themselves?
-
What did California sign with China that everyone is saying is unconstitutional? I tried to look into it and honestly cannot find what exactly it is.
-
Edited by Dexter307: 6/8/2017 9:26:45 AMMove to a better state lel
-
4 RepliesSeriously? Um save your own lives and spend California's money on research. I, for one, am tired of paying for everyone's shit. A person on welfare, food stamps, and living in government subsidized housing "earns" more than I do being a social worker/child psychologist giving those same people free health care and mental health services. There was a graphic artist at the magazine I used to work at that was making $47,500 a year and asked our boss for a 25% raise because at the end of the month he didn't have any extra money. My boss, at the time, told him that that wasn't in the budget and that that wasn't his problem. The graphic artist said "So what am I supposed to do, it's like I'm working for free". My boss "phased him out". He's a very old school conservative and felt that this man was an entitled princess. I tend to agree but most people using these government services do not have any interest in getting a job or working for that which they can get for free. And who can blame them. I wouldn't mind being given 75k a year to smoke weed and watch tv. Anyway, no, we don't want to pay for Cali's things and Cali can pay for it herself. Or just leave the United States like that petition says. Cali would be better off as it's own country anyway.
-
If it's cut from the federal budget then there's nothing stopping the state from adding it in its own budget. What's the problem?
-
5 RepliesCalifornia should be paying for that.
-
5 RepliesBut they're commies out there. If they don't succeed from the union, I think slipping into the ocean is a viable outcome.
-
22 RepliesCalifornia can ask the celebrities for funding.