{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Gravy Train:
11/6/2016 9:54:26 PM
39
FBI review of new emails doesn't change conclusion on Clinton
Surprise, [url=https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2016/11/06/politics/comey-tells-congress-fbi-has-not-changed-conclusions/index.html?client=safari] surprise.[/url]
[quote]"Based on our review, we have not changed our conclusions that we expressed in July," Comey said in the letter to top Republicans on the House Oversight Committee.[/quote]
Where's all that damning evidence I was promised by Trump and the Trumpettes?
English
#Offtopic
-
The emails are a big nothing burger.
-
Lmao she probably paid em all off
-
2 RepliesI didn't know you could review 650k emails in 8 days, and definitely didn't have multiple threats on your life or anything.
-
It took them two years to review the first 35,000. You're telling me they reviewed 650,000 in eight days? Yeah ok.
-
It's fine, because it reopening didn't change my mind about how asinine the FBI handled it in the first place... :)
-
3 RepliesIs this supposed to make me think that Clinto and her entire group arent the most corrupt politicians to run for president yet? Can you explain to me why she deleted tens of thousands of emails? Thats not what innocent people do.
-
-
7 RepliesDude why don't you do some research before posting? They only went through 600 of the thousands of emails so him saying what he said was dumb af and I wouldn't be suprised if he's payed off
-
3 RepliesEdited by john5550: 11/7/2016 3:49:47 PMWow. It's amazing that were able to pore over those hundreds of thousands of emails in a week. Especially since it took them months to go over the 30,000 emails before these and didn't charge her then even they though admitted she broke the law. It's almost as if there's no consequences when the Clintons break the law. I wonder why.
-
GET READY FOR TOMORROW EVERYONE
-
[quote]FBI review of new emails [i][b]was never going to[/i][/b] change conclusion on Clinton[/quote]
-
[quote]Where's all that damning evidence I was promised by Trump and the Trumpettes?[/quote]Check wikileaks. I dunno why anyone expected this to turn out differently though, she was already proven above the law in the Summer .
-
26 RepliesYou mean that -blam!-ing nothing story led to -blam!-ing nothing?
-
She has too much money and influence to be found guilty of anything.
-
not all the emails, or other files, were released for investigation, so this article doesnt prove shes innocent in the slightest
-
Its just comney playing party politics. >Says he doesnt want to implicate russia to influence the election. >Quick to attack clinton on emails that were not even hers.
-
10 RepliesEdited by JTAssassins: 11/7/2016 12:31:29 AMFBI is literally pulling forged documents from Russian and blatantly making claims about Hillary. It's a conservative coup.
-
4 RepliesInb4 Trumplets claim it's rigged.
-
Because they only raised it to try and sway the election.
-
10 RepliesOf course they didn't change their conclusion, and they were never going to, just like voting wasn't going to change the fact that Hillary was always going to be nominated as the Democratic candidate and just like Hillary was always going to be elected. Now all talk of investigating the FBI and suing for the records on the Clinton and DOJ meeting will all be quietly swept away, and we will get to enjoy years of more overreaching government and self-destruction, because "they know what's best for us." The polarization and forced acceptance of liberal social agendas, along with the government and media corruption, will continue as expected, and no one will have a choice in the matter.
-
It feels good that in 2016 the director of the FBI likes to troll
-
http://www.mostdamagingwikileaks.com/new-leaks Right here
-
1 Reply
-
I think politics is overrun by evil. We just don't see it because they shine a light that's fake.
-
5 RepliesSo we're all going to ignore that trump allegedly can't read?[spoiler]this was said about him by a lot of people who have worked along side with him. Who knows if this is true but the fact that multiple people have came out and has proven this is enough to make me not vote for someone who has no political experience and allegedly can't read[/spoiler]
-
I still dont know what the email deal is, wasnt she supposed to have one or something?
