Then don't read it. I didn't ask you to. If you want the answer it's there. If you don't then fine. But honestly the answer should be obvious at this point. So as I stated earlier, get to the point or I will no longer consider this discussion meaningful. Ok?
English
-
I made my point in the first reply though. Cheating and exploiting are 2 different things
-
And your point would be morally incorrect. They are not different. Anything else?
-
But that is where you are wrong. My statement is more morally correct than your entire post. Why? Because yours is based off of your own personal opinion whereas mine comes from solid facts
-
Edited by Scorpius XX1: 5/21/2016 6:09:07 AMThat's completely ridiculous. Are you honestly going to sit there and suggest that your opinion, not mine, countermands hundreds of years of societal understanding in regards to what cheating is? Give me a break. By definition you are wrong genius. How can it be morally acceptable to cheat? It can't. I'm not using my opinion, I'm using the actual definition. Perhaps you should look it up before making yourself look like an ass. I have seen some really dumb statements on here, but yours has to be in the top ten of all time stupid things to say. No offense. And quite frankly, if you can understand, or refuse to understand, that exploitation is the opposite of moral responsibility, then we really do not have anything further to discuss. You are in dire need of a Dictionary dude. There is nothing morally acceptable about exploiting something that is broken for your own personal gain. The moral thing to do would be not to. We learn this as children in first grade. Muted.