{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Milo Mills Auto:
4/15/2013 10:05:50 PM
23
America is gonna look for someone easy to blame, or did it learn from 2001?
Article for those who don't know what I'm talking about
America was quick to place the blame in 2001 and invaded a country who had nothing to do with it, but it was easy to make up connections.
Same thing today, people will probably want to invade N Korea becuase of their threats or maybe someone. Soon are military is going to be fighting a country or a group over this. Question is who, and if it was the person responsible. Will America give justice to the people who actually did it? Or point the finger at the nearest enemy, like North Korea? That is the question.....
English
#Offtopic
-
bin Laden was very fast to take credit for 9/11. No one has taken credit for this attack, and the police don't have any suspects at this time (reports of a "Saudi national" being detained are bullshit).
-
We blamed Al-Qaeda in 2001 because UBL came out on video and said he was responsible. Therefore we attacked Afghanistan. Iraq had nothing to do with 911. It was all about WMD's. So I fail to see the point of you're topic.
-
2 RepliesYou're f*ckin retarded. I find it unsettling in the fact that you breathe the same air I breathe.
-
When in doubt, blame a minority race. That's how American media works.
-
3 RepliesIts been confirmed, it was Kim
-
There are unconfirmed reports this may be a failed nuclear strike by North Korea
-
Its kinda easy to make the connection between 9/11 and terrorist especially when you have video of them claiming ownership of the attacks
-
1 ReplyAnyone thinking that NK was responsible is retarded.
-
7 RepliesAre you saying we shouldn't have invaded Afghanistan? Lol you were probably just a baby in 2001.
-
hold on partner, we don't even have a clear suspect as of now. This is just getting started
-
2 Repliesback in 2001, we had an idea of who it was and where we thought he was. So thats why we reacted quickly. I could be wrong, i really didnt follow politics till recently
-
2 RepliesYou know who's birthday it is, don't you?
-
When in doubt, blame the republicans, since they are the cause of everything that is bad.
-
I bet you think you're being clever, but you've actually managed to make yourself look like a huge idiot.
-
Op was probably 4 in 2001 and had no idea what was going on.
-
Of course the news will all say: Right wing National Socialist christian fundamentalist constitutionalist libertarian korean domestic terrorist. Cause for Christ sake the Gov always needs a new enemy to blame.
-
17 RepliesFirst, we're not going to war over 2 people dying. Americans aren't [i]that[/i] jumpy. Second, in the wake of 9/11. we had a blamable source for the attack--a non-state actor known as Al-Qaeda. We pursued that target into their primary safe haven, Afghanistan. OP is an idiot, people.
-
5 Replies[quote]America was quick to place the blame in 2001 and invaded a country who had nothing to do with it, but it was easy to make up connections.[/quote]Incorrect. America was quick to go to Afghanistan, which made sense (at least relatively so compared to Iraq). Iraq didn't happen until 2003, there's was nothing quick about it, and the case made then was much more complex than "Iraq is responsible for 9/11" as you allege. Please get your facts right if you're going to make these kinds of accusations.
-
2 RepliesOP is really smart.
-
I changed it. Holy -blam!-.....
-
O Milo you.
-
You might want to change your title bud; Iraq wasn't the country the US invaded in 2001.
-
