{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/3/2013 1:41:19 AM
17
Which is worse?
-
Halo 4 was just bad all around. Forge sucked, the campaign was too short, and spartan ops was nothing compared to firefight. The multiplayer was passable but extremely dissatisfying compared to the quality of what bungie made halo to be. 343 is going to ruin halo's good name unless they get it right for 5
-
8 commentairesReach campaign sucked but everything else was awesome. So I would say Halo 4 is the worst.
-
1 commentaireWhy would you even ask that?
-
5 commentairesI stated the series with Reach, I'm just glad the Forerunner Saga made me realise it was more than just a generic alien invasion story.
-
1 commentaireModifié par The Random : 9/3/2013 8:19:53 PMIt's funny, I played Reach Firefight alone recently after having played the Halo 4 campaign a few days prior just for the hell of it. There are a-lot of subtle things in-game I used to take for granted. All the original sounds of the weapons, vehicles, Covenant, shield recharge, explosions, etc. The Spartan armor that actually looks like Spartan armor, the Covenant species and their armor, the vehicles like the Warthog all seem much better looking. Everything is so much more customizable, from the Forge options to the custom game settings, to the Firefight settings. The UI is so much easier to navigate. Everything seems so right, like the way it should be for a Halo game. It's truly amazing to see just how alienated Halo 4 is from the rest of the series. There were so many subtle things that were altered that make the experience in Halo 4 not a Halo one for me.
-
-
-
1 commentaireReach does things better than Halo 4 Halo 4 does things better than Reach Both games have plenty of issues though, but Reach was much more impressive from a technical standpoint.
-
3 commentairesI would say Reach, it had horrible gameplay and the main rifle sucked hard, bloom was broken. Most of those things were fixed in Halo 4, but Halo Reach had more content, better looking maps (minus the gritty dark feeling) and the original feel of Halo in that weapons were placed around the map rather than lolordnance. Halo 4 is at least playable on good days and on maps that don't suck. If I were to put Legendary Slayer as the main game for Halo 4 (which unfortunately it is not) I'd say Halo 4 is miles better than Halo Reach. But since Halo 4 has the Infinity Slayer gametype as it's main focus it loses major points.
-
3 commentairesReach imo was a great game, people just hated the DMR and look of the guns, it was a lot better than Halo 4
-
I gotta pick reach because of the introduction to Jet Packs and Armor Lock.
-
Reach is the lesser of the two evils.
-
Halo 4. Halo reach was arguably the most packed with content game on 360. All halo 4 did was take the bad of reach and the good of COD and smash them together. Think fussion
-
3 commentaireslolReach Unbelievable how bad it is.
-
6 commentairesHalo 4. At least Halo Reach had some good things, like Forge, campaign theatre, custom games options and non fugly armour.
-
1 commentaireHalo reach was one of the best games bungie made :0
-
3 commentaires
