{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
1/3/2017 12:25:20 PM
25
Damn congrats, didn't know people had it that hard.
English
-
Me and four friends boosted another friend to class A and S last night because he couldn't even finish in 3rd on his own.
-
Just a normal human?
-
Yeah, fully healthy person, just terrible at soarrow racing.
-
-
Some people find it difficult for some raisin, though it was good for a laugh and I kept getting rewards, so everyone benefited.
-
[quote]Some people find it difficult for some raisin, though it was good for a laugh and I kept getting rewards, so everyone benefited.[/quote] raisin
-
Not a futurama fan?
-
[quote]Not a futurama fan?[/quote] Am I expected to memorize ever obscure reference to a TV that's been around like 10 years?
-
Only when you're calling attention to it.
-
[quote]Only when you're calling attention to it.[/quote] And how is one expected to know when one is making an obscure reference? Especially one so nonchalant and minimalist? Nice try though, put in some effort on your pop culture references instead of something you saw in a rerun yesterday.
-
[Quote] And how is one expected to know when one is making an obscure reference? Especially one so nonchalant and minimalist? [/quote] Context clues. I clearly write English very proficiently. The odds of me making that mistake are very low. You should've been able to deduce that it was intentional even without knowing it was referencial. [QUOTE]Nice try though, put in some effort on your pop culture references instead of something you saw in a rerun yesterday.[/quote] Haven't watched it in about maybe 6 or 7 years actually. Guess I have a better memory than you.
-
[quote][Quote] And how is one expected to know when one is making an obscure reference? Especially one so nonchalant and minimalist? [/quote] Context clues. I clearly write English very proficiently. The odds of me making that mistake are very low. You should've been able to deduce that it was intentional even without knowing it was referencial. [QUOTE]Nice try though, put in some effort on your pop culture references instead of something you saw in a rerun yesterday.[/quote] Haven't watched it in about maybe 6 or 7 years actually. Guess I have a better memory than you. [/quote] Context clues over a single potential auto correct error? You're a clown lol.
-
If you're assuming it's auto correct making the mistake, that's even worse. The sequence for reason and raisin are very distinct from each other in a way that they wouldn't overlap. Critical thinking my man.
-
[quote]If you're assuming it's auto correct making the mistake, that's even worse. The sequence for reason and raisin are very distinct from each other in a way that they wouldn't overlap. Critical thinking my man. [/quote] You've turned a simple joke into turning yourself into a fool in record time. These forums never disappoint.
-
You're the one who got mad about your own ignorance, not me.
-
Mad? Lol... Like I said, fool.
-
Yeah, you threw a hissy fit. Also, good to see you have no argument and have to resort to insults. :D
-
It's like you just live to be butthurt. It's not an insult, you're acting like a fool. It's just how you are choosing to define your personality. That's on you, not me.
-
Look at you, still being mad. It's ok, everyone is wrong and ill informed from time to time, doesn't mean you need to lash out about it.
-
[quote]Look at you, still being mad. It's ok, everyone is wrong and ill informed from time to time, doesn't mean you need to lash out about it.[/quote] You're trying so hard to troll right now, you know saying I'm mad over and over isn't actually going to make me mad, right? A toddler can incite the argument you so desperately desire better than this. You're better off trying somebody else, you're not good enough at this to trigger me. Maybe try a topic that isn't cartoons next time.
-
You must be really upset to be continuing to defend your clear an obvious aggrivation that screwed the pooch. It's not my fault you didn't understand the reference. Also if you're going to try to look down on watching cartoons, remind yourself that you're on a forum for a videogame about space magic and aliens.
-
Modifié par S0ulBearer : 1/3/2017 6:24:09 PM[quote]You must be really upset to be continuing to defend your clear an obvious aggrivation that screwed the pooch. It's not my fault you didn't understand the reference. Also if you're going to try to look down on watching cartoons, remind yourself that you're on a forum for a videogame about space magic and aliens.[/quote] [quote]aggrivation[/quote] Is that a Futurama reference too or is that because you are so proficient in the English language? I also never looked down on cartoons, I very clearly said a cartoon isn't a topic that would rile me up to angry levels. Don't play yourself.
-
Modifié par NefariousNarwhal : 1/3/2017 6:43:09 PM[quote] Is that a Futurama reference too or is that because you are so proficient in the English language? [/QUOTE] Context clues would suggest a spelling error. Which is a completely different scenario from mistaking the word raisin for reason. [quote]diwn[/quote] See, context clues makes it obvious that this is an error. [Quote]I also never looked diwn on cartoons, I very clearly said a cartoon isn't a topic that would rile me up to angry levels. Don't play yourself. [/quote] No, you said 'Next time try a topic that isn't cartoons,' the previous text is about how constantly stating 'u mad' isn't gonna make you mad. If that's your idea of clear and concise, I suggest you not become a writer.
-
[quote][quote] Is that a Futurama reference too or is that because you are so proficient in the English language? [/QUOTE] Context clues would suggest a spelling error. Which is a completely different scenario from mistaking the word raisin for reason. [quote]diwn[/quote] See, context clues makes it obvious that this is an error. [Quote]I also never looked diwn on cartoons, I very clearly said a cartoon isn't a topic that would rile me up to angry levels. Don't play yourself. [/quote] No, you said 'Next time try a topic that isn't cartoons,' the previous text is about how constantly stating 'u mad' isn't gonna make you mad. If that's your idea of clear and concise, I suggest you not become a writer. [/quote] It's like you just avoid what's actually being said in order to formulate whatever nonsense stance you want to take next by ripping apart random parts of responses and entirely ignoring what was said in the previous sentence. Well, my work here is done.
-
[quote] It's like you just avoid what's actually being said in order to formulate whatever nonsense stance you want to take next by ripping apart random parts of responses and entirely ignoring what was said in the previous sentence. Well, my work here is done. [/quote] Inaccurate statement. Your previous post entails a point you claim was 'clearly made'...which is also false. Basically you're not a good writer, terrible at debating your point, unaware of early 2000 pop culture references, and you probably club baby seals.
