I don't mind exclusives much but I just love the logic of the arguments from ps4.
I love how ps4 owners just say suck it up,deal with it or buy a ps4.
But if the roles were reversed they'd be bitching just as much.
Plus how bout no. We all payed for the same game we should all get the same shit at the same time.
Inb4 some random PS4 player comes along and speaks for all ps4 owners saying "Na man we really don't care" like he's the spokesperson of all ps4 players.
English
-
Roles were reversed last gen
-
for like 1 month at a time.
-
Actually skyrim dlc took months to get
-
fair enough .. assassins creed then . that took 6 months for Xbox to get any extras. see we can do this all day . exclusives happen. :( Sadly, either we as gamers ( not this console, or that console owner) must learn to vote with wallets or accept this trend.
-
Na man we really don't care -the spokesperson of all ps4 players
-
Bullshit -spokesperson of bullshit callers
-
The liquor's callin the shots now bud
-
You had to have one sip of beer huh?
-
Beer and coolers don't count!
-
Well Xbox gets the division early? Why dont ps4? Don't say beacuse Microsoft paid because that's a stupid argument from your point of view? Why's it ok for Xbox get tomb raider 12 months before early? When I see Xbox officially complaing to Microsoft about it then your point will be valid. Plus Microsoft started it all off with COD many years ago. No Xbox player was whinging about it then
-
i dont like The division i hate games like that in 3rd person and i also hate toomb raider so what do i gain? And like others here if you arnt happy "write a letter to microsoft blah blah blah" just end the exclusives all together
-
1 month vs 1 year
-
actually 2 weeks early for The Division.
-
2 weeks vs 52 weeks.
-
exclusive gun with no effect on your game play vs full parts of the game, raids, missions, ect...
-
Modifié par Deadbutt : 4/8/2016 7:49:24 PMFalse And also it's two weeks. Not a fuçking year. In a year it will be old ass news.
-
You do realize you're arguing about exclusivity in a game, and exclusivity of a couple guns in another game, right? Just thought I'd point out that it's probably not as cataclysmic as you're putting on. Plus, like I told OP; When you're all grown up and are the marketing manager at a company that produces everything from consoles to phones to touchscreen tables that can support up to four separate users concurrently, then you can throw all your money at the Bungie screen. Until then, either get over it or find something worthwhile to cry about.
-
If i owned a game then nobody would get exclusives id make it the best game possible at the time and everybody would enjoy it equally rather than having complaints that they have this and we dont have that so why ?
-
And that's great, but I was talking about the huge mega corporation that didn't throw money at the screen for exclusivity. Blame Microsoft for not ponying up the dough. Not having exclusivity in games would be ideal, but as long as gaming is a multi-million dollar industry, the almighty dollar shall rule.
-
I don't know if you read or not but I'm not complaining about exclusives I'm complaining about how ps4 users are reacting to Xbox users. Learn how to read.
-
My comment was to a later comment to your comment. Bungie nerfed the order in which things fall apparently. Either way, it's a couple guns. Get over it. Microsoft should've ponied up the dough.
-
Oh my bad then and dude I know what's done is done my gf has destiny on ps4 either way I try whatever gets on both consoles.
-
It's all good. I just feel like firebolts with VF and ignite are a much bigger problem.
-
umm I was just correcting you on the facts.. XB1 player here, so please unrustle those jimmies. and if I'm just reading you wrong, sorry
-
There are no rustled jimmies here