{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
11/30/2016 4:06:40 PM
14
Flawless Change Possibly?
It has been very VERY hard to go flawless, and for some people it is practically impossible. So how about if flawless was 9 wins, but you can still have 2 losses? Most people just dismantle their passage at 7 wins, but what if we could go flawless at 9-2? With the DDossers, hackers, and red bars, it seems fair that we get a bit of a leeway. What do you think?
-
The light house isn't worth much anymore with streamers doing carries an people paying for recoveries now like that what trials has came down to.
-
1 ReplyFlawless means no losses on card, just as everyone else has and will point out. However I will agree that hitting 9 even with losses should yield something. Not a flawless, but at least another roll for gear or gun, or even a chroma drop for shader and such. As it stands there is no reason to play past 7 with a loss.
-
I understand the struggle but that's far too easy, It would just destroy the fan base that currently play every week.
-
1 Reply*grabs popcorn and takes seat in back row*
-
2 RepliesCan I have the definition of flawless plz
-
The worse you are the better your teammates need to be, that's how you get flawless when your a potato like me 👍
-
I think an imperfection would disqualify anything from being called "flawless."
-
Not flawless if you have losses. I've never been to the lighthouse but even I agree you should never be allowed with losses on your card. I can agree with a higher bracket after flawless to bring more casuals in, more people seeing lighthouse etc. But even then, flawless stays flawless.
-
-
What part of 2 losses equals flawless? Its fine as is. Not meant for average players
-
Didn't know we changed the definition of the word flawless
-
[quote]It has been very VERY hard to go flawless, and for some people it is practically impossible. So how about if flawless was 9 wins, but you can still have 2 losses? Most people just dismantle their passage at 7 wins, but what if we could go flawless at 9-2? With the DDossers, hackers, and red bars, it seems fair that we get a bit of a leeway. What do you think?[/quote] Lmfao now y'all want 3 losses?? Smh so entitled. [spoiler]Flawless is ez[/spoiler]
-
01001001 01110100 01110011 00100000 01100001 01101100 01110111 01100001 01111001 01110011 00100000 01100010 01100101 01100101 01101110 00100000 01100101 01100001 01110011 01111001 00100000 01100110 01101111 01110010 00100000 01101101 01100101 00101110 00101110 00101110
-
Yea I've never been and need the easy ride.
